NASA “pauses” Mars Sample Return mission
Perseverance’s first set of core samples,
placed on the floor of Jezero Crater
Faced with a strong threat of major budget cuts from the Senate, NASA has decided to “pause” the Mars Sample Return mission (MSR) by ramping back some work to consider major changes to the project.
We brought Steve [Thibault] downtown to be the chief engineer in the Headquarters MSR program office … leading a team that consists of all the implementing centers and our European colleagues to stand back and take a look at the architecture with a fresh set of eyes and figure out not only just how to improve our technical margins and make the mission more robust, but also to see if there are ways to implement it in ways to potentially save costs. We’re also going off and listening to industry and seeing what ideas they have.
While the House had approved NASA’s budget request that exceeded $1 billion to complete the mission (more than double its original price tag), the Senate responded by only allocating one quarter of that, demanding NASA come up with a plan that would match its original budget number. This Senate pressure was enhanced by an independent review that harshly criticized the present design of the project, which involves three NASA centers, European participation, and multiple American companies, all building different components that must all interact perfectly.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
Perseverance’s first set of core samples,
placed on the floor of Jezero Crater
Faced with a strong threat of major budget cuts from the Senate, NASA has decided to “pause” the Mars Sample Return mission (MSR) by ramping back some work to consider major changes to the project.
We brought Steve [Thibault] downtown to be the chief engineer in the Headquarters MSR program office … leading a team that consists of all the implementing centers and our European colleagues to stand back and take a look at the architecture with a fresh set of eyes and figure out not only just how to improve our technical margins and make the mission more robust, but also to see if there are ways to implement it in ways to potentially save costs. We’re also going off and listening to industry and seeing what ideas they have.
While the House had approved NASA’s budget request that exceeded $1 billion to complete the mission (more than double its original price tag), the Senate responded by only allocating one quarter of that, demanding NASA come up with a plan that would match its original budget number. This Senate pressure was enhanced by an independent review that harshly criticized the present design of the project, which involves three NASA centers, European participation, and multiple American companies, all building different components that must all interact perfectly.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
“..listening to industry and seeing what ideas they have.” Industry will probably have people standing on Mars watching these robots puttering around just to haul back a miniscule amount of material for scientific study. When will the mindset at NASA change? Unfettered Industry is their path to success.
I conjecture that if NASA had not forced SpaceX to abandon the Super Draco propulsive landing plan for the Dragon capsule (forcing them to uses parachutes instead) then we’d already have a perfectly suitable platform to build the Mars sample return mission around for free.
SpaceX had already stated intentions to send some Dragon missions to Mars. And as they are designed to land with a substantial payload in a robust and stable hull that has all the power, comms, and avionics you’d need, it would have been pretty trivial to integrate a recovery drone, sample loading system, and return rocket stage into a Dragon based configuration compared to a From Scratch design. And in all likelihood such a mission could have been flying already for far less than even the original budget.
MHO anyway.
It is amusing that the otherwise fiscally skinflint GOP-controlled House just opened up the money spigot for MSR, and it was the Democratic-controlled Senate that deployed the hammer. But the explanation seems to be porky in nature.
Honestly, though, given the requirements for this mission, I don’t think that even the most aggressively commercial profile is going to get the cost down a whole lot. And then we will get to see which end of Congress is going to get its way.
Ok, let’s think about the unthinkable (to quote Herman Kahn). Let’s get rid of NASA. What is the value of a Soviet style entity in space exploration? Sell off the facilities – the parts that make sense will be purchased. if there are no buyers, it shows what they are worth. Funding for research can come from the public. And yes it can work
“The Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation is the independent nonprofit technology transfer organization serving the University of Wisconsin–Madison and Morgridge Institute for Research. It provides significant research support, granting TENS OF MILLIONS (my emphasis) of dollars to the university each year and contributing to the university’s “margin of excellence”.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wisconsin_Alumni_Research_Foundation
There is nothing to prevent organizations banding together in consortia to fund major projects.
Some institutions can fund major projects by themself. Harvard is sitting on $41B, Yale $30B, Stanford $28B, Princeton, $26B, MIT $17B, Penn $15B, etc, etc. Consider the profits if Harvard’s $40B is making just average returns in the market…..
The super Dracos are still used on the craft. They are the emergency escape system.
To use them for landing on Mars would not require anything more than some Earth side testing and maybe a few adjustments.
NASA’s plan should be to turn the entire project over to SpaceX and just let them run with it.
It seems possible that the US empire will be defeated by China when it comes to Mars samples!?
Tianwen-3: China’s Mars sample return mission (present launch date target: 2031)
https://www.planetary.org/articles/tianwen-3-china-mars-sample-return-mission