<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: NASA scientists in a battle with astronomers over who gets to name things on Vesta and Mars.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-scientists-in-a-battle-with-astronomers-over-who-gets-to-name-things-on-vesta-and-mars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-scientists-in-a-battle-with-astronomers-over-who-gets-to-name-things-on-vesta-and-mars/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 04:03:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Laurel Kornfeld		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-scientists-in-a-battle-with-astronomers-over-who-gets-to-name-things-on-vesta-and-mars/#comment-59328</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Laurel Kornfeld]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2012 04:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=19253#comment-59328</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Planetary scientists too will eventually tell the IAU where to go if the IAU does not budge from its determination to never reopen the planet definition discussion. The organization adopted a terrible definition and now refuses all requests to reopen the issue, even though its planet definition pertains only to our solar system and not to exoplanets. Significantly, of the four percent who voted on the controversial IAU decision in 2006, most are not planetary scientists but other types of astronomers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Planetary scientists too will eventually tell the IAU where to go if the IAU does not budge from its determination to never reopen the planet definition discussion. The organization adopted a terrible definition and now refuses all requests to reopen the issue, even though its planet definition pertains only to our solar system and not to exoplanets. Significantly, of the four percent who voted on the controversial IAU decision in 2006, most are not planetary scientists but other types of astronomers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
