Comments on: New data suggests the water content of lunar magma is 100 times higher than previously thought https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/new-data-suggests-the-water-content-of-lunar-magma-is-100-times-higher-than-previously-thought/ Tue, 31 May 2011 13:57:21 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Stu Harris https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/new-data-suggests-the-water-content-of-lunar-magma-is-100-times-higher-than-previously-thought/#comment-20525 Tue, 31 May 2011 13:57:21 +0000 http://behindtheblack.com/?p=9378#comment-20525 Richard Hoagland has totally misunderstood this announcement, and has misinformed the radio audience. I wish you could get on C2C to correct.

]]> By: Walter Walkie https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/new-data-suggests-the-water-content-of-lunar-magma-is-100-times-higher-than-previously-thought/#comment-20407 Fri, 27 May 2011 04:53:00 +0000 http://behindtheblack.com/?p=9378#comment-20407 hah

]]> By: Charles Alvarez https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/new-data-suggests-the-water-content-of-lunar-magma-is-100-times-higher-than-previously-thought/#comment-20397 Thu, 26 May 2011 20:08:53 +0000 http://behindtheblack.com/?p=9378#comment-20397 This is not good news for Robert Zubrin.

]]>