What a good question, because President Clinton mucked up the ISS program in order to assure that such a fiasco could not happen. Clinton’s idea was that if we keep the Russian rocket scientists busy working on ISS parts then evil nations, such as Iran and North Korea, would not be able to develop their own ICBMs to threaten the rest of the world.

Now, however, North Korea is bragging that they now threaten the rest of the world.

Now the Russians are massing troops on NK border, preparing for something.

Wayne, I do not know. But it reminds me of a nitrogen mixture that we use with explosives.

No, the reconciliation I speak of has to do with the Clintons and the law. There has been formally crafted two sets of laws for the Clintons as of late, over and above the usual gray area allowed in Congress for the politically empowered.

Specifically what has pushed this way over the line is the FBI director, Comey political action “I can find no intent” comment followed by no indictment related to the email server situation. Then we have the Uranium One / Clinton Foundation situation. Either of which we both would have long ago been on a federally sponsored vacation, but not the Clintons because they have fallen under the political realm rules of law.

https://ipolitics.ca/2012/12/31/china-north-canadas-resources-and-chinas-arctic-long-game/

Just like the Uranium One deal the Chinese and the Russians are make very large and long term global domination moves while we are consumed with corrupted sell out politicians that are enriching themselves.

There must be a massive reconciliation in America and the reconciliation must begin with Hillary and go right down the line no matter the consequence.

While the initial attack by N. Korea would be pretty devastating to Seoul the question remains, does N. Korea have the capability to also launch nukes before their launch capability is disabled and destroyed?

After the initial attack response by the North the resulting allied attack (read American) will have to be devastating and complete to the military and top leadership infrastructure of the North. Why is this very unlikely to happen? Because its very big and very ugly from the Wests point of view. But you never know what might set it all off.

And who in the short term may benefit most? China? Russia? Both look forward to America to be further bogged down with Macro problem situations. What will we do?

Its got to be big and devastating and crippling and then it will progress from there into the insanity of war.