<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Northrop Grumman writes off $100 million on its fixed-price Lunar Gateway contract	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/northrop-grumman-writes-off-100-million-on-its-fixed-price-lunar-gateway-contract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/northrop-grumman-writes-off-100-million-on-its-fixed-price-lunar-gateway-contract/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2024 01:10:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard M		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/northrop-grumman-writes-off-100-million-on-its-fixed-price-lunar-gateway-contract/#comment-1443122</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2024 01:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=102285#comment-1443122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello Bourbon,

&quot;Is this an indirect way of admitting that the current economy and inflation is impacting the program?&quot;

It seems the most obvious reading of it. Everybody in the industry has had their supply chains hit by inflation - even SpaceX.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Bourbon,</p>
<p>&#8220;Is this an indirect way of admitting that the current economy and inflation is impacting the program?&#8221;</p>
<p>It seems the most obvious reading of it. Everybody in the industry has had their supply chains hit by inflation &#8211; even SpaceX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sippin_bourbon		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/northrop-grumman-writes-off-100-million-on-its-fixed-price-lunar-gateway-contract/#comment-1443082</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sippin_bourbon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2024 20:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=102285#comment-1443082</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;...combined with macroeconomic challenges.” 

Is this an indirect way of admitting that the current economy and inflation is impacting the program?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;combined with macroeconomic challenges.” </p>
<p>Is this an indirect way of admitting that the current economy and inflation is impacting the program?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Edward		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/northrop-grumman-writes-off-100-million-on-its-fixed-price-lunar-gateway-contract/#comment-1442919</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 16:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=102285#comment-1442919</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Robert wrote: &quot;&lt;em&gt;In a fixed price contract NASA is not suppose to issue change orders.&lt;/em&gt;&quot; 

This is correct.  NASA became accustomed to changing its requirements all the way through its cost-plus contracts.  Which is why all those cost-plus contracts seemed to always go over budget and finish late.  Perhaps the agency just cannot get out of that habit.  

From the article: 
&lt;blockquote&gt; ... evolving Lunar Gateway architecture and mission requirements ... &lt;/blockquote&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert wrote: &#8220;<em>In a fixed price contract NASA is not suppose to issue change orders.</em>&#8221; </p>
<p>This is correct.  NASA became accustomed to changing its requirements all the way through its cost-plus contracts.  Which is why all those cost-plus contracts seemed to always go over budget and finish late.  Perhaps the agency just cannot get out of that habit.  </p>
<p>From the article: </p>
<blockquote><p> &#8230; evolving Lunar Gateway architecture and mission requirements &#8230; </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
