Oh and Bob can’t be the science advisor on Art’s show because Richard Hoagland is and he also will be broadcasting his own show right after Art’s.

I can’t believe Art is coming back!!! This is fantastic news!!! Looks like a 2 hour pre show with open lines on the July 19th with the first show on July 20th . . . :-)

Its reasonable to be skeptical about a high percentage of what ever has been observed, especially from the 60’s on due to certain lets say military and “other” manipulations, tests and technological what have you. But being skeptical still does not answer the question about an all be it small percentage of very hard to explain events.

To just relegate your judgement to the safe box of skeptisism is just that playing safe which is scientifically valid but it still leaves questions unanswered. If these things are something, then what are they? Science is about answering questions, even if they make you uncomfortable.

I actually think that having a skeptic brought in on the issue is a much better way to go instead of a Kool Aid drinker that sees secret civilizations who forgot to turn the lights out on their secret base on Ceres or someone who makes definite statements about things that no one is able to make definite statements about. You be a skeptic, Coast will present you with some challenges to reasonably explain.

One example? Bentwaters. I look forward to the conversations.

Steve Warner (darkcity.fm) interviewed Hoagland over the weekend about exactly this. “George threw a hissy fit on the air” were Hoagland’s own words. He really unloaded on Noory.

For the first time since Coast listener 2005 (WLS then iPhone app) – the last few weeks I’ve found myself looking at the previous night’s shows to fall asleep to, and rolling my eyes at some of the topics, thinking man have we REALLY run out of topics to talk about now? And will now generally only put on the shows that deal with quantum physics, space flight and archeology etc. Richard has about 3/4 very good valuable material that keeps me entertained, engaged and he’s a very good orator. I don’t mind the theories on moon bases and what the Apollo crews may have seen and all that good stuff. It taps into my love of Sci-Fi, and who’s to say. Especially when other speakers talk about Nean-Sapiens being compatible, and that how do we know we haven’t done this rodeo before a million years ago and we would find our own human ruins on other local bodies? i think we would have found some kind of fossilized ruins here in some layers, buildings and technology but..

The last couple hours last week of you (Bob) made me look deeper and see if you had a show of your own or how you host your material. Very good orating, well presented and make for fun listening!

I have a theory, and if you listen carefully at one of the most bizarre exchanges I’ve ever heard on Coast couple weeks ago, Richard had a hard-on for pushing George into hosting the Pluto Fly-By, and kept needling him to get the producers to extend the show longer. It was very awkward and I bet George had some very serious words for him on the break?
Maybe that was what got you in and he out.

Congrats.

“Perhaps the appropriate title should be Resident Pseudo-skeptic.”

Hey, people can disagree, but your approach to debate, calling me names, is beneath you. I have the right to be skeptical, and the obligation to say so if I am.

Absolutely not! I haven’t gotten around to scheduling things. I plan on doing some tomorrow. When I do that, I email you.

Send more Willi. I really appreciate it.

David, I wouldn’t say anyone unseated Richard. He now has his own broadcast program 5 nights a week. Out of courtesy, I won’t say where.

Robert, whenever you are scheduled I make it a priority to catch that evening’s show! Kudos!

Perhaps you could place a link to the C-to-C web site on your site? I can’t bookmark pages on the library’s computers.

Hoagland is not a spring chicken anymore and honestly would expect the amount of trouble he can cause will decrease with time.

So, the suggestion I made wasn’t good enough?

Thank you for the kind words, as always.

Hey, where are those evening pause suggestions?! For the first time in almost a year I am about to do a scheduling run and I have no suggestions from Danae!

As far as debating Hoagland, he’s a hog. He does not want debate. In fact over the years they had guests on that were 180º opposite some of Hoagland’s fantasies, and somehow Hoagland managed to call in and wreck those interviews. I recall Art Bell acting surprised one night (big laugh!) when Hoagland was put on the air. The show went straight downhill that night as Hoagland was his usual drama queen self.

Beware!

Someone behind Coast to Coast is showing signs of intelligence. Patrick Moore’s interview last night was another step in the right direction.

With your enthusiasm, plus all that’s happening in space, you should definitely have enough ongoing exposure to nudge listeners’ interest more toward scientific endeavor. Sadly, I’ve had no response to three emails asking that George inquire into your caving experiences. But, whatever an evening’s topic may be, your half of the conversation will always be intelligible to the layperson, and refreshingly honest.

Congratulations, and best wishes!

Cotour

I agree with you. George does not seem to take a position on the topic but if anything he’s struck me as a skeptic, which I consider myself as well. That’s not to be confused with a denier. It just seems to be that the man made global warming hypothesis is far more politics than science.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Vall%C3%A9e

Valle is a very reasonable and highly educated investment banker / investigator and has some very interesting thinking about what we do not know about time and space and what UFO’s may or may not be. If not nothing explainable and they are something, than what?

But its the possible pairing of you with Richard C. Hoagland in a segment that I would think would be a bit of an interesting circus to listen to and might have you looking to jump out your window (your in a one story house I hope).

I listen to Coast often and your segments are always top of the line, congratulations.

I would not say that that is true, Coast has many varied guests on many varied subjects and they in general discuss both sides of an issue or Mr. Noory throws out relevant questions.

Some subjects are pretty wacky and down the rabbit hole but in general I do not believe that George Noory himself is a “Global Warming” / “Climate Change” adherent, quite the opposite, he understands the political manipulation that is under way that uses this “global warming” Pavlovian trigger terminology .

Whether or not Richard H’s ideas are silly is a matter of opinion, but he certainly has been entertaining.