<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Orbital ATK developing new rocket	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/orbital-atk-developing-new-rocket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/orbital-atk-developing-new-rocket/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 07:20:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dick Eagleson		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/orbital-atk-developing-new-rocket/#comment-976969</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Eagleson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 07:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=44992#comment-976969</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Actually, it isn&#039;t an SRB.  That seemed to be the original plan when this NGL project was first broached awhile back.  The segments &lt;i&gt;will&lt;/i&gt; be the same size as Shuttle/SLS SRB segments, and they&#039;ll still be expendable, but the propellant formulation is different and the cases are filament-wound carbon fiber composites, not metal.  The NGL is, emphatically, &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; going to be a repurposing of Shuttle/SLS bits.  I hope that proves to be a good thing.  It will certainly be a &lt;i&gt;different&lt;/i&gt; thing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it isn&#8217;t an SRB.  That seemed to be the original plan when this NGL project was first broached awhile back.  The segments <i>will</i> be the same size as Shuttle/SLS SRB segments, and they&#8217;ll still be expendable, but the propellant formulation is different and the cases are filament-wound carbon fiber composites, not metal.  The NGL is, emphatically, <i>not</i> going to be a repurposing of Shuttle/SLS bits.  I hope that proves to be a good thing.  It will certainly be a <i>different</i> thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: fred		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/orbital-atk-developing-new-rocket/#comment-976913</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fred]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 20:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=44992#comment-976913</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#062;  To complete the rocket’s development the company says it needs to win a follow-up contract that the Air Force has been issuing to help ween the U.S. from the use of Russian rocket engines.

LOL. 

Goin to the trough for some good, ol&#039; gov&#039;t pork.

What a joke.  It is an existing SRB, paid for with NASA pork and they want AF pork to pay for it again?   It&#039;s an SRB ... not at all what the engine pork is intended for.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;  To complete the rocket’s development the company says it needs to win a follow-up contract that the Air Force has been issuing to help ween the U.S. from the use of Russian rocket engines.</p>
<p>LOL. </p>
<p>Goin to the trough for some good, ol&#8217; gov&#8217;t pork.</p>
<p>What a joke.  It is an existing SRB, paid for with NASA pork and they want AF pork to pay for it again?   It&#8217;s an SRB &#8230; not at all what the engine pork is intended for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
