Oxygen found in the most distant known galaxy, too soon after the Big Bang
The uncertainty of science: Astronomers studying the most distant galaxy so far discovered, 13.4 billion light years away and existing only 300 million years after the Big Bang, have now detected the existence of oxygen, an element that simply should not have had the time to develop in such a short time span.
The new oxygen detection with ALMA, a telescope array in Chile’s Atacama Desert, suggests the galaxy is much more chemically mature than expected. “It is like finding an adolescent where you would only expect babies,” says Sander Schouws, a PhD candidate at Leiden Observatory, the Netherlands, and first author of the Dutch-led study, now accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal. “The results show the galaxy has formed very rapidly and is also maturing rapidly, adding to a growing body of evidence that the formation of galaxies happens much faster than was expected.”
Galaxies usually start their lives full of young stars, which are made mostly of light elements like hydrogen and helium. As stars evolve, they create heavier elements like oxygen, which get dispersed through their host galaxy after they die. Researchers had thought that, at 300 million years old, the Universe was still too young to have galaxies ripe with heavy elements. However, the two ALMA studies indicate JADES-GS-z14-0 has about 10 times more heavy elements than expected.
The spectroscopy that confirmed the oxygen also allowed the scientists to confirm the galaxy’s distance, which also confirmed the fact that there is something seriously wrong with the present theories of cosmologists about the formation of the universe. Present theory requires at least several generations of star birth followed by star death, with each forming heavier and heavier atoms. Such a process is expected to take far more than 300 million years.
Either that theory is very wrong, or the theory of the Big Bang has problems. The facts don’t fit the theories, and when that happens, it is the theories that must be abandoned.
Readers!
My annual February birthday fund-raising drive for Behind the Black is now over. Thank you to everyone who donated or subscribed. While not a record-setter, the donations were more than sufficient and slightly above average.
As I have said many times before, I can’t express what it means to me to get such support, especially as no one is required to pay anything to read my work. Thank you all again!
For those readers who like my work here at Behind the Black and haven't contributed so far, please consider donating or subscribing. My analysis of space, politics, and culture, taken from the perspective of an historian, is almost always on the money and ahead of the game. For example, in 2020 I correctly predicted that the COVID panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Every one of those 2020 conclusions has turned out right.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
The uncertainty of science: Astronomers studying the most distant galaxy so far discovered, 13.4 billion light years away and existing only 300 million years after the Big Bang, have now detected the existence of oxygen, an element that simply should not have had the time to develop in such a short time span.
The new oxygen detection with ALMA, a telescope array in Chile’s Atacama Desert, suggests the galaxy is much more chemically mature than expected. “It is like finding an adolescent where you would only expect babies,” says Sander Schouws, a PhD candidate at Leiden Observatory, the Netherlands, and first author of the Dutch-led study, now accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal. “The results show the galaxy has formed very rapidly and is also maturing rapidly, adding to a growing body of evidence that the formation of galaxies happens much faster than was expected.”
Galaxies usually start their lives full of young stars, which are made mostly of light elements like hydrogen and helium. As stars evolve, they create heavier elements like oxygen, which get dispersed through their host galaxy after they die. Researchers had thought that, at 300 million years old, the Universe was still too young to have galaxies ripe with heavy elements. However, the two ALMA studies indicate JADES-GS-z14-0 has about 10 times more heavy elements than expected.
The spectroscopy that confirmed the oxygen also allowed the scientists to confirm the galaxy’s distance, which also confirmed the fact that there is something seriously wrong with the present theories of cosmologists about the formation of the universe. Present theory requires at least several generations of star birth followed by star death, with each forming heavier and heavier atoms. Such a process is expected to take far more than 300 million years.
Either that theory is very wrong, or the theory of the Big Bang has problems. The facts don’t fit the theories, and when that happens, it is the theories that must be abandoned.
Readers!
My annual February birthday fund-raising drive for Behind the Black is now over. Thank you to everyone who donated or subscribed. While not a record-setter, the donations were more than sufficient and slightly above average.
As I have said many times before, I can’t express what it means to me to get such support, especially as no one is required to pay anything to read my work. Thank you all again!
For those readers who like my work here at Behind the Black and haven't contributed so far, please consider donating or subscribing. My analysis of space, politics, and culture, taken from the perspective of an historian, is almost always on the money and ahead of the game. For example, in 2020 I correctly predicted that the COVID panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Every one of those 2020 conclusions has turned out right.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
These are fun times to be living in regarding cosmology… Galaxy formation… Wrong! Hubble’s constant…. Wrong! Black holes properties….. Wrong!
I’m actually sure the the cosmologists and physicists are also excited… New physics is their dream…. And I’m also looking forward to being proved right that dark matter and dark energy should never have been moved from placeholders to doctrine. It’s always been a dodgy principal to claim to understand anything you can’t see, taste or measure. Go science! ( And leave that budget alone Mr Trump!)
Lee S wrote: “And I’m also looking forward to being proved right that dark matter and dark energy should never have been moved from placeholders to doctrine. It’s always been a dodgy principal to claim to understand anything you can’t see, taste or measure.”
I am as skeptical as Lee S. Dark matter and dark energy are merely hypotheses (although I doubt the educatedness of these guesses, reducing them to assumptions, not hypotheses) that were put in place to explain the unexplained. They are similar to the assumption of aether, in the good old days, to explain the medium through which electromagnetic waves (e.g. light and radio) could propagate, because until a century ago everyone knew that waves must propagate through a medium, otherwise they cannot exist. It turned out that the universe is stranger and more mysterious than anyone had imagined. That was a failure of imagination, which could be the reason so many scientists believe in the undiscovered “dark” forces that they think act on a galactic scale.
I wonder whether the affects of dark matter factor into the attractions of the galaxies, or does visible matter adequately explain their relative accelerations toward each other.
I think I remember reading recently that some cosmologists theorize that the universe is actually twice as old as is currently assumed, and if true, then there would be no need for dark matter and energy to explain the observed universe. Maybe that could also explain the heavy elements found?
I’d love to see Steady State make a comeback
As for the uncertainty of science — and sometimes the authorities just getting things wrong — take a look at the article A Stellar Revolution Turns 100 in the May issue of Sky & Telescope. (Yeah, they publish them considerably ahead of time.)
Cecilia Payne-Gaposchkin (1900-79) was correct in her measurement of the relative abundance of hydrogen and helium as compared to the “metals” in stars, but this result was hotly contested by such authorities as Henry Norris Russell, and she was forced to redact her findings in her groundbreaking doctoral thesis. Now, standing on her shoulders and those of the other giants of her era who figured out where the elements come from and explicated the role of stars in “cooking” them through the end of their journeys along the Main Sequence or otherwise, we are wondering where all of the extra oxygen might come from. (Back when I was a kid, I remember reading both some of CP-G’s popular books and also those by such scientists as George Gamov and Fred Hoyle. It’s amazing how far we have come… and how many questions remain.)
Per the other comments, it is a great time to be engaged in fundamental science, isn’t it.
Never did like the Big Bang. Still don’t.
Check out Mike McCulloch https://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.com
Quantum Inertia. Explains a lot.
Mike-
Never did like the Bang myself. Rather fond of the Conformal Cyclic Cosmology theory from Dr. Roger Penrose.
(He dispenses with the problem of entropy quite well, which is not addressed in bang-theory.)
Inflation is made up as well, in my opinion.
“Aeon’s Before the Big Bang”
Conformal Cyclic Cosmology
Dr. Roger Penrose
Copernicus Center Lecture 2010
https://youtu.be/4YYWUIxGdl4
1:57:35
this is yet more evidence for timescape theory, which says FLRW errs in assuming a flat space/time and extends relativity into backreactions from local mass
since, as a result, time passes around 30% faster in voids, the photons we receive from distant objects that travel across voids can actually be a bit older than our local universe, so the redshift-calculated age appears impossibly old
the implication is that this Z+14 galaxy is probably quite a bit less young than it appears, perhaps even billions of years old
“The Universe Existed Before the Big Bang”
featuring Roger Penrose et al
https://youtu.be/SbPncSyw-fM
18:59