Comments on: Pentagon makes believe Iran isn’t using $1.7 billion for military

By: wayne

wayne — Fri, 23 Dec 2016 00:24:33 +0000

Mitch S–
Hate to go with those negative waves again…. but Trump isn’t going to unilaterally reject the non-treaty treaty. He’ll tweak it at best. Boeing already sold the jets to the Iranian’s.
Mitch & Corker engineered the whole thing. It could not have happened unless Mitch wanted it to happen— for what reason would they help Trump get rid of something they like?

By: Mitch S

Mitch S — Thu, 22 Dec 2016 20:51:08 +0000

One month to Mattis!
Obama’s self-delusional obsession with the Iran deal is going to be the future subject of many articles and academic papers.

By: Cotour

Cotour — Thu, 22 Dec 2016 20:37:57 +0000

To say nothing of the $150 billion related to the Iran deal, isn’t this $1.7 billion due to a ransom that Obama chose to pay for hostages in addition to the $150 billion?

If you did not get real and not phony BS concessions from your enemy and have fabricated a reason to enrich them by billions and billions of dollars I can only classify that as one thing, TREASON. No?

There are consequences to elections, lets see the consequences of Trump reconciling Obama’s attempts to weaken America and strengthen Iran . There should be a reasoned and reasonable but ruthless, both within and outside the U.S government, and a take no prisoners re-balancing of things purposefully skewed against our country perpetrated by both party’s leaderships over the last 30 years.

If it looks like a duck and qwacks like a duck its probably a duck that Obama is trying to tell you is a pigeon and the pigeon is Islamic and America is based in large part on Islam.