<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Private space station builder Bigelow is hiring again.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/private-space-station-builder-bigelow-is-hiring-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/private-space-station-builder-bigelow-is-hiring-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:50:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kelly Starks		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/private-space-station-builder-bigelow-is-hiring-again/#comment-45213</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly Starks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=16173#comment-45213</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ok, why would nASA ever want to buiy &quot;BEAM&quot;?

Note:
&#062;&#062;NASA gave no sign that a deal with Bigelow was imminent. “We do have a no-cost contract with Bigelow to cover early requirements development [for BEAM] but it is not for the flight article,” NASA spokesman Josh Buck said in a March 20 email. “The Agency has not made a decision to go to a flight system yet.” &#060;&#060;

So it doesn&#039;t sound like NASA actually intends to buy or use - oe support - a BEAM pods.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, why would nASA ever want to buiy &#8220;BEAM&#8221;?</p>
<p>Note:<br />
&gt;&gt;NASA gave no sign that a deal with Bigelow was imminent. “We do have a no-cost contract with Bigelow to cover early requirements development [for BEAM] but it is not for the flight article,” NASA spokesman Josh Buck said in a March 20 email. “The Agency has not made a decision to go to a flight system yet.” &lt;&lt;</p>
<p>So it doesn&#039;t sound like NASA actually intends to buy or use &#8211; oe support &#8211; a BEAM pods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
