(Copy and share with a friend)

I do not have a problem with this news item below. (As long as she is not an activist and legislating from the bench)

https://news.yahoo.com/california-makes-history-first-openly-033358956.html

I do however have a problem with this: https://media4.manhattan-institute.org/sites/cj/files/what-lia-thomas-means.jpg

There is a vast difference between the capacity of a man or a woman’s mind and intellect, and their body’s capacity in physical competition. Sorry, this is just not intellectually sustainable nor is it equitable.

Two I am sure very nice people that find themselves at the forefront of social and cultural evolution and I have respect for them both in their struggle for acceptance and wish them both well. Like it or not America is evolving in some untraditional ways that not all will be happy to see, but there it is all the same. Our country in time will find its reasonable and truly equitable balance at some point.

This is our system; this is our process.

There are lines of common sense that cannot be intellectualized into being rational, reasonable and equitable. To say nothing about the sacrificial disruption of an entire young female segment of society allegedly championed by the Feminist movement. Feminism and the Feminist movement is by evidence a selective, woke, politically correct fraud. Its service and purpose to the country is long over. And few can argue against that conclusion.

At what point in American politics did it become acceptable to sacrifice young American women in athletic competition in the name of an intellectualized sense of “equity”? There is no equity here. If you are on the woke, politically correct extreme Left, are you willing to sacrifice your young daughter’s future on the woke, politically correct alter of athletic competition? I didn’t think so.

Language warning, remember its Bill Maher and he is on cable: https://youtu.be/05Q1Bzg5zTY

Bill Maher being a more rational American Liberal, which is a more acceptable and tolerable American political animal IMO eviscerates the woke, politically correct radical Left which is fundamentally based in Marxist philosophy and seeks to destroy America and its Constitution in order that they be able in their collective wisdom to rewrite it. (And that is some crazy assed wisdom.)

Politically I do not always agree with Maher, not by a long shot but he has an ability and a talent for calling out the BS (Bovine Swill) that is presented by those on the extreme radical Left (Or Right) who have come into their own in America and present themselves as rational, good and necessary thinkers. They in fact are the enemies of the Constitution because it was the concept of and was instituted by men who primarily had white skin. They state that the Constitution is trash and needs to go. (Uh! Get over it already.)

I was in conversation with a very good female gay friend who I love just the other night who came to talk to me about some things going on in the world which she was happy to inform me that we agree on. And inevitably when that kind of conversation goes down if you are talking to me, I am compelled to share my interpretation of what exactly the Constitution is and what it structures and why. Just so everyone is on the same page. It becomes a mini seminar. And most times my interpretation is very well received and understood by all. (It’s really not as unpleasant as it sounds :)

And the subject came up of the “White” man nature of the origin of the Constitution. And in the end, we agreed that what the Constitution was at its beginning, written by those “evil” men with white skin for the most part, is not what we have today. And what the Constitution has evolved to be today, good bad or otherwise, from what it was originally is much more inclusive and empowering for the vast majority and all concerned in America.

The Constitution works and is in full force and is operational as the cleansing political warfare that it structures in order that the politically empowered be revealed to the people rages on.

Progress was made, the Constitution does not need to be thrown out the window and rewritten. The methods for changing and evolving it exists within the document itself. Is it perfect? No, but it’s the best that there is hands down.

And IMO it certainly does not need to be rewritten and or “Improved” by a bunch of Marxist philosophy based radicals who find themselves empowered today whose handy work Mr. Maher is so cuttingly and insightfully shredding and commenting on.

There is hope America, as long as we are willing to face ourselves and have the conversation.

We now “accept” the denial or reality in favor of emotion, to the point where something as incontestable (by perception and conception) as sexual gender, is evaded.

Biological sex has become “fungible!”