Our ancestors clearly understood the danger of tolerating such perversion and that was passed down to us in the cultural traditions and laws against it. We were fools to tear up that fence without understanding why it was there and are now reaping the consequences.

strong intolerance with the university’s Christian beliefs
Yes, because Progressivism is a heresy whose primary purpose is to displace Christianity. After all, you can’t have your transhuman and hedonistic utopia with those icky Christian morals and belief in a creator god standing in the way.

Are we only performing performative solidarity
No, it is real religious belief they are exercising. Sick and perverted, but it is real belief.

is this school value aligned with what we’re trying to do
IOW, they aren’t the right religion (one that allows perverts and hedonists free reign, particularly with children). They are using Progressive language (“values”) to try and hide the very religious intent of their actions.

While the board has the right in the future to pick and choose who it wished to work with
No, it does not. Federal anti-discrimination law says they absolutely cannot discriminate on the basis of religious belief. And if the school is excluded from any future contract consideration, I hope it sues with an army of lawyers on exactly that basis. An animosity toward one religion is absolutely forbidden. (And putting in something about tolerance for homosexuals is not actually legal, since that is very much a religious belief statement.)

Today however that queer community is aggressively attempting to teach sexual perversion to other people’s children.
It’s called evangelism.

For the parents to vote for such people is appalling.
Because the voters are likely overwhelmingly Progressive, though many wouldn’t know it as such. Progressivism has been very subtle in twisting language and thought away from Christian values and toward Progressivism. (And they’ve been terribly blatant in some cases, too.) “Tolerance” and “fairness” and “rights” that aren’t.

Their bigotry cost the tax payers thousands in court costs defending their personal bigoted opinions. And if they had their way would cost the taxpayer millions in the future by loosing the free teaching positions provided by the university.
With such childish attitudes they should never have a position in public office.

Do you understand this is primarily about the children?

When somebody offers you free labor in the form of student teachers, you take it and say thank-you on behalf of the taxpayers who pay your salary.

You’d think it was the Spanish Inquisition.

Tolerance is not enough.
Acceptance is not enough.
Insufficiently enthusiastic celebration will be punished.

From the numbers, it looked like many voters chose zero or one candidate, but it was enough to get the two farthest-left candidates in office.

The worst part is district taxpayers will end up footing the bill, not the board members who flagrantly broke the law. And this whole episode has apparently reinforced the support for the board from activists, so expect more candidates of this type in future elections.

It’s sad, but the district really helped my son go from way behind his peers in kindergarten to gifted in middle school. But when the entire district illegally walked out on every student in May of 2018, we walked away from any further involvement.

The LGBTQ+/ community has gone from an attitude of wanting acceptance to one in which they demand participation. This is why they teach sexual perversion to children. They want participants. The problem with going after children is that they are far more subject to peer pressure and the desire to go along to get acceptance. I have a nephew who has joined his friends in choosing to be non-binary, with the accompanying pronouns.

Now they reject anyone else who has other ideas. It is the very definition of bigotry:
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/bigotry

noun
1. stubborn and complete intolerance of any creed, belief, or opinion that differs from one’s own.

2. the actions, beliefs, prejudices, etc., of a bigot.

They are the very enemy that they complained about only a third of a century ago. They feel that the religious are the intolerant ones, but look who is now unwilling to put up with the others. The various churches accommodate them, but they reject the churches completely. Now that they have taken control of the schools, now that they are the power in the schools, their absolute power has absolutely corrupted them.