<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rocket Lab reschedules first Wallops launch to January	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/rocket-lab-reschedules-first-wallops-launch-to-january/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/rocket-lab-reschedules-first-wallops-launch-to-january/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 22:33:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Star Bird		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/rocket-lab-reschedules-first-wallops-launch-to-january/#comment-1384850</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Star Bird]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2022 22:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=91169#comment-1384850</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When   can  we  all  send     liberals  to Mars?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When   can  we  all  send     liberals  to Mars?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sippin_bourbon		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/rocket-lab-reschedules-first-wallops-launch-to-january/#comment-1384092</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sippin_bourbon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 23:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=91169#comment-1384092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They do not want another commercial success like SpaceX on their hands...
Making them look bad.

(In my cynical opinion)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They do not want another commercial success like SpaceX on their hands&#8230;<br />
Making them look bad.</p>
<p>(In my cynical opinion)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Zimmerman		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/rocket-lab-reschedules-first-wallops-launch-to-january/#comment-1384078</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Zimmerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 23:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=91169#comment-1384078</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/rocket-lab-reschedules-first-wallops-launch-to-january/#comment-1384071&quot;&gt;Richard M&lt;/a&gt;.

Richard M: I have been struck by the difference in behavior in these bureaucracies between the Trump and Biden administrations. Under Trump, these bureaucrats were made very aware that they were not to become an obstacle to success, and if they were, Trump&#039;s team hammered them. The result was few delays, and much progress.

Under Biden, they are free to do what they want, and what they want to do is to exert power and hammer private enterprise. The result has been a slow down of development across a number of fronts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/rocket-lab-reschedules-first-wallops-launch-to-january/#comment-1384071">Richard M</a>.</p>
<p>Richard M: I have been struck by the difference in behavior in these bureaucracies between the Trump and Biden administrations. Under Trump, these bureaucrats were made very aware that they were not to become an obstacle to success, and if they were, Trump&#8217;s team hammered them. The result was few delays, and much progress.</p>
<p>Under Biden, they are free to do what they want, and what they want to do is to exert power and hammer private enterprise. The result has been a slow down of development across a number of fronts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard M		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/rocket-lab-reschedules-first-wallops-launch-to-january/#comment-1384071</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 22:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=91169#comment-1384071</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Peter Beck&#039;s comments in today&#039;s article at SpaceNews really convey how frustrated he is with FAA red tape, in a way I&#039;ve never heard from him before.

&lt;i&gt;Rocket Lab was prepared to launch Electron Dec. 16, but the night before announced that the launch was postponed two days to allow NASA, which operates the Wallops Flight Facility co-located with MARS, and the Federal Aviation Administration to complete what the company called “range-driven documentation.”

The issue, Rocket Lab Chief Executive Peter Beck said in a Dec. 16 interview, involved differences between NASA and FAA on range safety and flight safety documentation. At a Dec. 14 briefing, NASA said it expected that paperwork to be completed in a day, but at a launch readiness review the two agencies said they needed more time to complete it.

Beck said he was “disappointed and frustrated” with the delay. “This is the first time and there’s always going to be some teething issues,” he said. “I guess we’re just frustrated that these teething issues didn’t happen six months ago. It happened literally days before we were ready to launch.” He noted the rocket and its payload had been ready to launch for nearly two weeks while waiting for final approvals.

The paperwork issue was not related to the rocket’s autonomous flight termination system. Its certification for use on Electron from Wallops was delayed by more than two years because of problems with the NASA-developed software for it.

[...]

Rocket Lab’s Launch Complex 1 in New Zealand, though, will remain the primary site for Electron. “We can turn stuff around quickly and be very commercial,” he said. The company owns the launch site and thus has much more control over operations. The challenges of getting started at Wallops, he said, “make you appreciate owning your own range where you’re in control of all of this and you’re dealing with one regulator directly.”

He said he expects that future launches from Wallops will go more smoothly. “That is what has been promised, and that is our expectation, because it can’t be like this.”&lt;/i&gt;

https://spacenews.com/weather-and-range-issues-delay-first-electron-launch-from-wallops-to-january/

This is the sound of a man reaching his breaking point with U.S. government bureaucracy. I would ask if the FAA and NASA are actually serious about making Wallops into a place where a lot more commercial launch activity takes place, but I comprehend that this is not the question your typical bureaucrat asks himself everyday.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter Beck&#8217;s comments in today&#8217;s article at SpaceNews really convey how frustrated he is with FAA red tape, in a way I&#8217;ve never heard from him before.</p>
<p><i>Rocket Lab was prepared to launch Electron Dec. 16, but the night before announced that the launch was postponed two days to allow NASA, which operates the Wallops Flight Facility co-located with MARS, and the Federal Aviation Administration to complete what the company called “range-driven documentation.”</p>
<p>The issue, Rocket Lab Chief Executive Peter Beck said in a Dec. 16 interview, involved differences between NASA and FAA on range safety and flight safety documentation. At a Dec. 14 briefing, NASA said it expected that paperwork to be completed in a day, but at a launch readiness review the two agencies said they needed more time to complete it.</p>
<p>Beck said he was “disappointed and frustrated” with the delay. “This is the first time and there’s always going to be some teething issues,” he said. “I guess we’re just frustrated that these teething issues didn’t happen six months ago. It happened literally days before we were ready to launch.” He noted the rocket and its payload had been ready to launch for nearly two weeks while waiting for final approvals.</p>
<p>The paperwork issue was not related to the rocket’s autonomous flight termination system. Its certification for use on Electron from Wallops was delayed by more than two years because of problems with the NASA-developed software for it.</p>
<p>[&#8230;]</p>
<p>Rocket Lab’s Launch Complex 1 in New Zealand, though, will remain the primary site for Electron. “We can turn stuff around quickly and be very commercial,” he said. The company owns the launch site and thus has much more control over operations. The challenges of getting started at Wallops, he said, “make you appreciate owning your own range where you’re in control of all of this and you’re dealing with one regulator directly.”</p>
<p>He said he expects that future launches from Wallops will go more smoothly. “That is what has been promised, and that is our expectation, because it can’t be like this.”</i></p>
<p><a href="https://spacenews.com/weather-and-range-issues-delay-first-electron-launch-from-wallops-to-january/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://spacenews.com/weather-and-range-issues-delay-first-electron-launch-from-wallops-to-january/</a></p>
<p>This is the sound of a man reaching his breaking point with U.S. government bureaucracy. I would ask if the FAA and NASA are actually serious about making Wallops into a place where a lot more commercial launch activity takes place, but I comprehend that this is not the question your typical bureaucrat asks himself everyday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Col Beausabre		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/rocket-lab-reschedules-first-wallops-launch-to-january/#comment-1383771</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Col Beausabre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2022 16:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=91169#comment-1383771</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Fer Pete&#039;s sake, they&#039;ve been launching at Wallops Island since the Fifties. RL had flight tested software. I see the insidious hand of the Biden Admin, NASA&#039;s need to justify its existence and regulatory creep at work]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fer Pete&#8217;s sake, they&#8217;ve been launching at Wallops Island since the Fifties. RL had flight tested software. I see the insidious hand of the Biden Admin, NASA&#8217;s need to justify its existence and regulatory creep at work</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
