<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rocket Lab to unveil its completed Neutron launchpad by end of August	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/rocket-lab-to-unveil-its-completed-neutron-launchpad-by-end-of-august/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/rocket-lab-to-unveil-its-completed-neutron-launchpad-by-end-of-august/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 20:51:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard M		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/rocket-lab-to-unveil-its-completed-neutron-launchpad-by-end-of-august/#comment-1616676</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2025 20:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=116138#comment-1616676</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;To go from a blank sheet to launch in only four years is unprecedented. Normally it takes about twice as long to get a rocket to the launchpad.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

There is the case of Falcon 1, which had its first launch almost exactly four years after SpaceX was founded (March 14, 2002) -- March 25, 2006, And, it had actually reached the launch pad the previous October, when SpaceX had first hoped to launch it. 

Now, it is unfair comparing anyone to a SpaceX accomplishment, and it is worth bearing in mind that Falcon 1 was only a small-class launcher, and a fully expendable one at that -- not a mostly reusable medium class launch vehicle, as Neutron is. (Also,  of course, that first Falcon 1 launch was a failure, having a fatal failure at T+26 sec. I think Peter Beck would like to do a bit better than that on hist first launch attempt.) So I think you are right that we should regard it as a remarkable accomplishment if they are able to stick to this schedule. Aside from possibly Stoke, they seem to be moving faster than any other launch company right now. I hope they can pull it off!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>To go from a blank sheet to launch in only four years is unprecedented. Normally it takes about twice as long to get a rocket to the launchpad.</p></blockquote>
<p>There is the case of Falcon 1, which had its first launch almost exactly four years after SpaceX was founded (March 14, 2002) &#8212; March 25, 2006, And, it had actually reached the launch pad the previous October, when SpaceX had first hoped to launch it. </p>
<p>Now, it is unfair comparing anyone to a SpaceX accomplishment, and it is worth bearing in mind that Falcon 1 was only a small-class launcher, and a fully expendable one at that &#8212; not a mostly reusable medium class launch vehicle, as Neutron is. (Also,  of course, that first Falcon 1 launch was a failure, having a fatal failure at T+26 sec. I think Peter Beck would like to do a bit better than that on hist first launch attempt.) So I think you are right that we should regard it as a remarkable accomplishment if they are able to stick to this schedule. Aside from possibly Stoke, they seem to be moving faster than any other launch company right now. I hope they can pull it off!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
