<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Russia announces plans to launch Phobos-Grunt 2 in 2018	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/russia-announces-plans-to-launch-phobos-grunt-2-in-2018/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/russia-announces-plans-to-launch-phobos-grunt-2-in-2018/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Art Harman		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/russia-announces-plans-to-launch-phobos-grunt-2-in-2018/#comment-40073</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Art Harman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 06:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=15123#comment-40073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is excellent news, Bob. I am very glad they won&#039;t throw away everything they developed for P-G and will work to achieve a victory in the end. 2018 will give them plenty of time to build, upgrade and thouroughly test everything. Had they not decided to re-do P-G, that would further have demoralized Russians on their space program, probably cost Roscosmos support in the Kremlin, and further demoralized Roscosmos workers. Always best after a fall to pick yourself up and try again!

Interesting how in the article, they are honest and admit P-G wasn&#039;t ready but they couldn&#039;t ask for a delay for political reasons.

I also agree with Russia&#039;s refocusing in general from Mars to the moon. They can accomplish a great deal on the moon at lower cost, and their lunar activities will fortify them for success at the red planet in the future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is excellent news, Bob. I am very glad they won&#8217;t throw away everything they developed for P-G and will work to achieve a victory in the end. 2018 will give them plenty of time to build, upgrade and thouroughly test everything. Had they not decided to re-do P-G, that would further have demoralized Russians on their space program, probably cost Roscosmos support in the Kremlin, and further demoralized Roscosmos workers. Always best after a fall to pick yourself up and try again!</p>
<p>Interesting how in the article, they are honest and admit P-G wasn&#8217;t ready but they couldn&#8217;t ask for a delay for political reasons.</p>
<p>I also agree with Russia&#8217;s refocusing in general from Mars to the moon. They can accomplish a great deal on the moon at lower cost, and their lunar activities will fortify them for success at the red planet in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
