<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SpaceX cancels launch after reviewing static fire test data	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-cancels-launch-after-reviewing-static-fire-test-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-cancels-launch-after-reviewing-static-fire-test-data/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 16:09:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: sippin_bourbon		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-cancels-launch-after-reviewing-static-fire-test-data/#comment-1369446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sippin_bourbon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 16:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=90269#comment-1369446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Shows that these static fires are still a good idea.
Some time not long ago, the question was posed if they will continue these, or not.

I think this answers the question. They are a needed step.

Also, I think it reflects how familiar the SpaceX engineers are with the engines and the performance data and shows that there is no &quot;go fever&quot; pushed from the top.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shows that these static fires are still a good idea.<br />
Some time not long ago, the question was posed if they will continue these, or not.</p>
<p>I think this answers the question. They are a needed step.</p>
<p>Also, I think it reflects how familiar the SpaceX engineers are with the engines and the performance data and shows that there is no &#8220;go fever&#8221; pushed from the top.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Wright		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-cancels-launch-after-reviewing-static-fire-test-data/#comment-1369183</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=90269#comment-1369183</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll just leave this here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEuw2mgLRuQ

Sorry, Elon...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll just leave this here:<br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEuw2mgLRuQ" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gEuw2mgLRuQ</a></p>
<p>Sorry, Elon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
