<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SpaceX launches 60 more Starlink satellites; 1st stage landing fails	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-launches-60-more-starlink-satellites-1st-stage-landing-fails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-launches-60-more-starlink-satellites-1st-stage-landing-fails/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 03:48:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: sippin_bourbon		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-launches-60-more-starlink-satellites-1st-stage-landing-fails/#comment-1076681</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sippin_bourbon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2020 03:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63655#comment-1076681</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Okay. I get. A failsafe into the water, and if everything is green redirects to the barge.

Result is the same, tho, this morning. All was not green, so it did not steer to the barge, and stuck with the default safe course. At least, that is what is being speculated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay. I get. A failsafe into the water, and if everything is green redirects to the barge.</p>
<p>Result is the same, tho, this morning. All was not green, so it did not steer to the barge, and stuck with the default safe course. At least, that is what is being speculated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Diane Wilson		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-launches-60-more-starlink-satellites-1st-stage-landing-fails/#comment-1076674</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diane Wilson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 21:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63655#comment-1076674</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@sippin-bourbon, it&#039;s the other way around; the normal descent path is into the water; if the entry burn and guidance are good, it will dog-leg to the landing spot. True for both land and barge landings. So if anything goes wrong, the default is &quot;into the water.&quot;

What&#039;s curious (haven&#039;t checked for a couple of hours) is that apparently the first stage did a soft landing over water.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@sippin-bourbon, it&#8217;s the other way around; the normal descent path is into the water; if the entry burn and guidance are good, it will dog-leg to the landing spot. True for both land and barge landings. So if anything goes wrong, the default is &#8220;into the water.&#8221;</p>
<p>What&#8217;s curious (haven&#8217;t checked for a couple of hours) is that apparently the first stage did a soft landing over water.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sippin_bourbon		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-launches-60-more-starlink-satellites-1st-stage-landing-fails/#comment-1076672</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sippin_bourbon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 19:41:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63655#comment-1076672</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Still no word on fairing capture. 

I caught a comment (tweeter, I think) that stated that if there is an anomaly detected, the booster will steer to avoid the landing barge, to avoid the possibility of damage to the vessel.

Not sure if this is the case here, or wild speculation.

I liked the launch angle too, at the start. Appeared to be a camera at the top of the retracted tower? Or maybe one of the grounding towers.

What would be super would be a 3d feed on the next one, so I can have can watch with one of these fancy VR head sets.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still no word on fairing capture. </p>
<p>I caught a comment (tweeter, I think) that stated that if there is an anomaly detected, the booster will steer to avoid the landing barge, to avoid the possibility of damage to the vessel.</p>
<p>Not sure if this is the case here, or wild speculation.</p>
<p>I liked the launch angle too, at the start. Appeared to be a camera at the top of the retracted tower? Or maybe one of the grounding towers.</p>
<p>What would be super would be a 3d feed on the next one, so I can have can watch with one of these fancy VR head sets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Willi		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-launches-60-more-starlink-satellites-1st-stage-landing-fails/#comment-1076671</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Willi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63655#comment-1076671</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The view of the first few seconds of liftoff was one of the best I&#039;ve ever seen...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The view of the first few seconds of liftoff was one of the best I&#8217;ve ever seen&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Calvin Dodge		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-launches-60-more-starlink-satellites-1st-stage-landing-fails/#comment-1076670</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Calvin Dodge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:18:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63655#comment-1076670</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The speed at MECO (7700 km/hr) seemed a little high to me. I wonder if the reentry cooked some guidance hardware.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The speed at MECO (7700 km/hr) seemed a little high to me. I wonder if the reentry cooked some guidance hardware.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sippin_bourbon		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-launches-60-more-starlink-satellites-1st-stage-landing-fails/#comment-1076668</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sippin_bourbon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 17:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63655#comment-1076668</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Cannot find any info on the fairings yet. I was a little disappointed.
This booster was going to have the fastest turn around at 8 weeks. 

Was pulling for them, as that just sounds phenomenal. However they have shown that they are very good at learning from the failures.

By the old school standard, &quot;did the payload make it to the correct orbit&quot; this was still a success.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cannot find any info on the fairings yet. I was a little disappointed.<br />
This booster was going to have the fastest turn around at 8 weeks. </p>
<p>Was pulling for them, as that just sounds phenomenal. However they have shown that they are very good at learning from the failures.</p>
<p>By the old school standard, &#8220;did the payload make it to the correct orbit&#8221; this was still a success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MDN		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-launches-60-more-starlink-satellites-1st-stage-landing-fails/#comment-1076665</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MDN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63655#comment-1076665</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Any word on the fairing recovery? I watched the summary clip at their site but it made no mention.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any word on the fairing recovery? I watched the summary clip at their site but it made no mention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Zimmerman		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-launches-60-more-starlink-satellites-1st-stage-landing-fails/#comment-1076662</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Zimmerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63655#comment-1076662</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-launches-60-more-starlink-satellites-1st-stage-landing-fails/#comment-1076661&quot;&gt;geoffc&lt;/a&gt;.

geoffc: You are correct. I have edited the post.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-launches-60-more-starlink-satellites-1st-stage-landing-fails/#comment-1076661">geoffc</a>.</p>
<p>geoffc: You are correct. I have edited the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: geoffc		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-launches-60-more-starlink-satellites-1st-stage-landing-fails/#comment-1076661</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geoffc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 16:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63655#comment-1076661</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You forgot CRS-16, where the grid fins hydraulic systems failed.  It spun up, and they continued to aim at the water, since they could not control it to divert it to land properly. 

They recovered in the last second for a soft landing on the water a mile or two offshore of the landing pad.  

Core 1050, Dec 2018.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You forgot CRS-16, where the grid fins hydraulic systems failed.  It spun up, and they continued to aim at the water, since they could not control it to divert it to land properly. </p>
<p>They recovered in the last second for a soft landing on the water a mile or two offshore of the landing pad.  </p>
<p>Core 1050, Dec 2018.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
