<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: SpaceX to use older Dragon capsule for next manned launch because of issues with new capsule	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-to-use-older-dragon-capsule-for-next-manned-launch-because-of-issues-with-new-capsule/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-to-use-older-dragon-capsule-for-next-manned-launch-because-of-issues-with-new-capsule/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 02:13:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Max		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-to-use-older-dragon-capsule-for-next-manned-launch-because-of-issues-with-new-capsule/#comment-1551968</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Feb 2025 02:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=112009#comment-1551968</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Could you imagine NASA asking “Boeing” if they can have a capsule ready to go sooner than promised?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you imagine NASA asking “Boeing” if they can have a capsule ready to go sooner than promised?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard M		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-to-use-older-dragon-capsule-for-next-manned-launch-because-of-issues-with-new-capsule/#comment-1551624</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 22:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=112009#comment-1551624</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gary,

Indeed!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary,</p>
<p>Indeed!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gary		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-to-use-older-dragon-capsule-for-next-manned-launch-because-of-issues-with-new-capsule/#comment-1551620</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 22:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=112009#comment-1551620</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think it’s pretty dang amazing to have a company’ which has the option to go to a back up capsule.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it’s pretty dang amazing to have a company’ which has the option to go to a back up capsule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard M		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/spacex-to-use-older-dragon-capsule-for-next-manned-launch-because-of-issues-with-new-capsule/#comment-1551552</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 18:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=112009#comment-1551552</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In SpaceX&#039;s defense, it is worth noting that the original timeline for completing Crew Dragon C213 was August 2025.

NASA asked SpaceX to move that up for use on Crew-10 last year, when the manifest for ISS got rejiggered. They did their best; but April just does not look doable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In SpaceX&#8217;s defense, it is worth noting that the original timeline for completing Crew Dragon C213 was August 2025.</p>
<p>NASA asked SpaceX to move that up for use on Crew-10 last year, when the manifest for ISS got rejiggered. They did their best; but April just does not look doable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
