<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Stardust found in meteorite older than Earth	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/stardust-found-in-meteorite-older-than-earth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/stardust-found-in-meteorite-older-than-earth/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 02:51:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Andi		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/stardust-found-in-meteorite-older-than-earth/#comment-1075319</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 02:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63004#comment-1075319</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Or in other words, they used the SWAG method.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or in other words, they used the SWAG method.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phill O		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/stardust-found-in-meteorite-older-than-earth/#comment-1075289</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phill O]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63004#comment-1075289</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Obviously there are uncertainties with this result,&quot;

This may be the understatement of the year.  There are many underlying assumptions to such dating techniques.  We can not prove such techniques because we do not have billions of years to verify that these assumptions are correct.

Abetter way is to say the current &quot;Guesstimates&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Obviously there are uncertainties with this result,&#8221;</p>
<p>This may be the understatement of the year.  There are many underlying assumptions to such dating techniques.  We can not prove such techniques because we do not have billions of years to verify that these assumptions are correct.</p>
<p>Abetter way is to say the current &#8220;Guesstimates&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
