<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Starlab partners with the interior design company Journey	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/starlab-partners-with-the-interior-design-company-journey/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/starlab-partners-with-the-interior-design-company-journey/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 21:27:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard M		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/starlab-partners-with-the-interior-design-company-journey/#comment-1613269</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 21:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=115879#comment-1613269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;Apparently nothing concrete will be done until Starlab wins the big NASA construction project — assuming it does so. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

And yet the sad reality is that this seems to be true of ALL of the commercial space station developers, to varying degrees -- even Max Haot at Vast has made clear that a big NASA award is going to be necessary to bring Haven-2 into operation. 

I think all four of these companies/consortiums have concluded that NASA is absolutely necessary both as a major funding source for station fabrication and assembly, as well as an anchor client. And as I noted on a previous Starlab thread, some creditable observers have wondered if a business case can really be closed even with NASA as a major stakeholder -- transportation costs may need to come down even more. I simply don&#039;t have enough information to say.

But I do share the sense of frustration that Voyager is not engaged in more actual *building* at this point.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Apparently nothing concrete will be done until Starlab wins the big NASA construction project — assuming it does so. </p></blockquote>
<p>And yet the sad reality is that this seems to be true of ALL of the commercial space station developers, to varying degrees &#8212; even Max Haot at Vast has made clear that a big NASA award is going to be necessary to bring Haven-2 into operation. </p>
<p>I think all four of these companies/consortiums have concluded that NASA is absolutely necessary both as a major funding source for station fabrication and assembly, as well as an anchor client. And as I noted on a previous Starlab thread, some creditable observers have wondered if a business case can really be closed even with NASA as a major stakeholder &#8212; transportation costs may need to come down even more. I simply don&#8217;t have enough information to say.</p>
<p>But I do share the sense of frustration that Voyager is not engaged in more actual *building* at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
