<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Starship prototype #15 readying for flight, possibly tomorrow	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/starship-prototype-15-readying-for-flight-possibly-tomorrow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/starship-prototype-15-readying-for-flight-possibly-tomorrow/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 03:28:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Max		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/starship-prototype-15-readying-for-flight-possibly-tomorrow/#comment-1125200</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2021 03:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=74954#comment-1125200</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Possible #15 improvements.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8c4Z6Iv2A8E]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possible #15 improvements.<br />
<a href="https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8c4Z6Iv2A8E" rel="nofollow ugc">https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8c4Z6Iv2A8E</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: geoffc		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/starship-prototype-15-readying-for-flight-possibly-tomorrow/#comment-1125119</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geoffc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 20:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=74954#comment-1125119</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Like angels dancing on the head of a pin. I am ok with how Bob said it.  Just saying.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like angels dancing on the head of a pin. I am ok with how Bob said it.  Just saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt in AZ		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/starship-prototype-15-readying-for-flight-possibly-tomorrow/#comment-1125091</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt in AZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 18:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=74954#comment-1125091</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Prototypes #12-14 were partially built, then scrapped, so I&#039;m good with that word.  However, #7 is the more arguable one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prototypes #12-14 were partially built, then scrapped, so I&#8217;m good with that word.  However, #7 is the more arguable one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: geoffc		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/starship-prototype-15-readying-for-flight-possibly-tomorrow/#comment-1125089</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geoffc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=74954#comment-1125089</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Technically this is not the 15th prototype, ince the SN15 name is a misnomer.  It is Serial Number 15, but 12-14 were cancelled.  But that is a stupid quibble, your point is basically correct.

Cannot wait to see it fly!  Hope it is this week!  Static fire on Tuesday... Fly soon after.

Just the turn around from roll out to pressure test to static fire to flight is so much better than SLS that I am happy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically this is not the 15th prototype, ince the SN15 name is a misnomer.  It is Serial Number 15, but 12-14 were cancelled.  But that is a stupid quibble, your point is basically correct.</p>
<p>Cannot wait to see it fly!  Hope it is this week!  Static fire on Tuesday&#8230; Fly soon after.</p>
<p>Just the turn around from roll out to pressure test to static fire to flight is so much better than SLS that I am happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
