<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Sunspot update: February activity declines to predicted values	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/sunspot-update-february-activity-declines-to-predicted-values/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/sunspot-update-february-activity-declines-to-predicted-values/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:57:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Phil Berardelli		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/sunspot-update-february-activity-declines-to-predicted-values/#comment-1116196</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Berardelli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 14:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=73654#comment-1116196</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bob, I absolutely agree. Your admirable and dogged work about &quot;the uncertainty of science&quot; should show anyone with an open mind that what we don&#039;t know still vastly outweighs what we know about so many subjects, including that middling star on which we owe our existence. Nevertheless, the instruments available during the last solar minimum could not resolve many of the sunspots our modern technology can identify.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, I absolutely agree. Your admirable and dogged work about &#8220;the uncertainty of science&#8221; should show anyone with an open mind that what we don&#8217;t know still vastly outweighs what we know about so many subjects, including that middling star on which we owe our existence. Nevertheless, the instruments available during the last solar minimum could not resolve many of the sunspots our modern technology can identify.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Zimmerman		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/sunspot-update-february-activity-declines-to-predicted-values/#comment-1116051</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Zimmerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 15:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=73654#comment-1116051</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/sunspot-update-february-activity-declines-to-predicted-values/#comment-1116043&quot;&gt;Phil Berardelli&lt;/a&gt;.

Phil Berardelli: I&#039;ve read a number of papers that proposed the same thing you do. However, in November and December we definitely had strong enough activity to have been spotted by those first telescopes in the 1600s.

The bottom line remains: No solar scientist in the world has the faintest understanding of the actual reasons the Sun&#039;s dynamo causes these cycles. All they do is predict based on past events. With such a limited understanding, no prediction is really nothing more than a guess.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/sunspot-update-february-activity-declines-to-predicted-values/#comment-1116043">Phil Berardelli</a>.</p>
<p>Phil Berardelli: I&#8217;ve read a number of papers that proposed the same thing you do. However, in November and December we definitely had strong enough activity to have been spotted by those first telescopes in the 1600s.</p>
<p>The bottom line remains: No solar scientist in the world has the faintest understanding of the actual reasons the Sun&#8217;s dynamo causes these cycles. All they do is predict based on past events. With such a limited understanding, no prediction is really nothing more than a guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phil Berardelli		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/sunspot-update-february-activity-declines-to-predicted-values/#comment-1116043</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Berardelli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 14:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=73654#comment-1116043</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bob, I&#039;ve been watching the solar image on spaceweather.com for the past several weeks, following the last prolonged period void of sunspots. There has been activity -- e.g., today&#039;s (3/9) number is 12, with a decaying zone to the southeast and a new zone emerging in the northwest of the image. But the sunspots aren&#039;t visible. They require more magnification to identify. 

It occurs to me that back during the previous Maunder Minimum the telescopes trained on the sun had no greater resolving power than what is displayed on that image. So, it&#039;s possible the sun was exhibiting the same amount of activity back then, but observers weren&#039;t able to record the tiniest sunspots.

That isn&#039;t to say we&#039;re in a new grand minimum, but it&#039;s possible. In any event, when I was covering the topic, the solar scientists I contacted were predicting the phenomenon to begin around 2030. It might be starting up early.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob, I&#8217;ve been watching the solar image on spaceweather.com for the past several weeks, following the last prolonged period void of sunspots. There has been activity &#8212; e.g., today&#8217;s (3/9) number is 12, with a decaying zone to the southeast and a new zone emerging in the northwest of the image. But the sunspots aren&#8217;t visible. They require more magnification to identify. </p>
<p>It occurs to me that back during the previous Maunder Minimum the telescopes trained on the sun had no greater resolving power than what is displayed on that image. So, it&#8217;s possible the sun was exhibiting the same amount of activity back then, but observers weren&#8217;t able to record the tiniest sunspots.</p>
<p>That isn&#8217;t to say we&#8217;re in a new grand minimum, but it&#8217;s possible. In any event, when I was covering the topic, the solar scientists I contacted were predicting the phenomenon to begin around 2030. It might be starting up early.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phill O		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/sunspot-update-february-activity-declines-to-predicted-values/#comment-1114305</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phill O]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 01:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=73654#comment-1114305</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the ongoing review of solar activity as depicted by the sunspot index. 

While this is a slow process (watching changes in cycles) it seems to me to be an extremely important topic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the ongoing review of solar activity as depicted by the sunspot index. </p>
<p>While this is a slow process (watching changes in cycles) it seems to me to be an extremely important topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
