<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Supreme Court upholds voter ID again	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/supreme-court-upholds-voter-id-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/supreme-court-upholds-voter-id-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:57:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Kirkendall		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/supreme-court-upholds-voter-id-again/#comment-732793</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Kirkendall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2015 04:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=33522#comment-732793</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Dems/Libs claim that a) there&#039;s really not much voter fraud, so there&#039;s no reason to address it, b) both parties are equally guilty of it, so it&#039;s a wash anyway, and c) it prevents minorities from voting. All three points are easily destroyed with even the most basic logical analysis. 

James O&#039;Keefe has repeatedly shown how easy it is to commit vote fraud &#038; how prevalent it is, utterly destroying a). We also saw in the 2012 election literally hundreds of examples of Democrat counties &#038; precincts in OH, PA &#038; other states where the voter turnout was OVER 100% - clearly an impossibility unless there was massive fraud. Argument a)? Don&#039;t make me laugh !!

As for b) - if both parties are equally guilty of vote fraud, why are virtually 100% of Dems opposed to stopping it &#038; 100% of GOPers/ Conservatives support measures to stop it? Would GOPers want to stop something they benefit from? Of course not! Obviously, Dems DO benefit from vote fraud, and that&#039;s why they oppose any effort to defeat it - so much for argument b)!  

As for c) - these minority voters that supposedly have so much difficulty obtaining a photo ID nevertheless have jobs, drive cars, board airplanes and buy liquor - all of which require some form of photo ID, obliterating that argument as well.

The bottom line is Photo ID does NOT prevent LEGAL voters from voting - it only prevents ILLEGAL ones from voting. It&#039;s encouraging that - finally - the USSC has upheld a good law. 

Final thought: You can always tell who benefits from a policy or law &#038; who doesn&#039;t by who supports or opposes it...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dems/Libs claim that a) there&#8217;s really not much voter fraud, so there&#8217;s no reason to address it, b) both parties are equally guilty of it, so it&#8217;s a wash anyway, and c) it prevents minorities from voting. All three points are easily destroyed with even the most basic logical analysis. </p>
<p>James O&#8217;Keefe has repeatedly shown how easy it is to commit vote fraud &amp; how prevalent it is, utterly destroying a). We also saw in the 2012 election literally hundreds of examples of Democrat counties &amp; precincts in OH, PA &amp; other states where the voter turnout was OVER 100% &#8211; clearly an impossibility unless there was massive fraud. Argument a)? Don&#8217;t make me laugh !!</p>
<p>As for b) &#8211; if both parties are equally guilty of vote fraud, why are virtually 100% of Dems opposed to stopping it &amp; 100% of GOPers/ Conservatives support measures to stop it? Would GOPers want to stop something they benefit from? Of course not! Obviously, Dems DO benefit from vote fraud, and that&#8217;s why they oppose any effort to defeat it &#8211; so much for argument b)!  </p>
<p>As for c) &#8211; these minority voters that supposedly have so much difficulty obtaining a photo ID nevertheless have jobs, drive cars, board airplanes and buy liquor &#8211; all of which require some form of photo ID, obliterating that argument as well.</p>
<p>The bottom line is Photo ID does NOT prevent LEGAL voters from voting &#8211; it only prevents ILLEGAL ones from voting. It&#8217;s encouraging that &#8211; finally &#8211; the USSC has upheld a good law. </p>
<p>Final thought: You can always tell who benefits from a policy or law &amp; who doesn&#8217;t by who supports or opposes it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: geoffc		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/supreme-court-upholds-voter-id-again/#comment-731556</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geoffc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=33522#comment-731556</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Goodness, a conservative who can win, and has won, and continues to win.  What will they think of next?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goodness, a conservative who can win, and has won, and continues to win.  What will they think of next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
