Surprise! NASA’s ’23 budget request asks for more money!
In releasing its budget request this week to Congress for the 2023 fiscal year, NASA did what it routinely does each year, ask for more money, this time asking for an 8% increase from what Congress appropriated last year.
NASA’s FY2023 budget request is $25.974 billion versus the FY2022 appropriation of $24.041 billion. NASA had requested $24.802 billion in large part to pay for the Artemis program to return astronauts to the lunar surface, but Congress wasn’t willing to allocate that much. While supportive of Artemis and NASA’s many other science, aeronautics and technology programs, there is a limit as to how much Congress is willing to invest.
NASA is requesting not just another boost in FY2023, but in the “out years” thereafter, rising to $28 billion in FY2027, though much of that purchasing power likely will be lost to inflation.
…In essence, the agency wants more money for everything it is doing.
The budget request also asks again for Congress to terminate the SOFIA airborne telescope, which NASA contends is not producing enough science to justify its $80 million annual cost. Congress has repeatedly refused to do so in past years. As should be expected, Congress will likely not cancel SOFIA again, as it likes to spend money we don’t have.
The goal of the increased funding for Artemis is also to continue the SLS program for many years to come. Expect Congress to also fund this in the coming few years, though the long term future of SLS remains in doubt, especially if SpaceX’s Starship begins flying. Artemis won’t be cancelled by our spendthrift Congress, but Congress will likely decide to shift that spending to Starship and other private rockets rather than SLS as those private rockets come on line.
All in all, expect Congress to give NASA more cash, but not as much as the agency requests.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
In releasing its budget request this week to Congress for the 2023 fiscal year, NASA did what it routinely does each year, ask for more money, this time asking for an 8% increase from what Congress appropriated last year.
NASA’s FY2023 budget request is $25.974 billion versus the FY2022 appropriation of $24.041 billion. NASA had requested $24.802 billion in large part to pay for the Artemis program to return astronauts to the lunar surface, but Congress wasn’t willing to allocate that much. While supportive of Artemis and NASA’s many other science, aeronautics and technology programs, there is a limit as to how much Congress is willing to invest.
NASA is requesting not just another boost in FY2023, but in the “out years” thereafter, rising to $28 billion in FY2027, though much of that purchasing power likely will be lost to inflation.
…In essence, the agency wants more money for everything it is doing.
The budget request also asks again for Congress to terminate the SOFIA airborne telescope, which NASA contends is not producing enough science to justify its $80 million annual cost. Congress has repeatedly refused to do so in past years. As should be expected, Congress will likely not cancel SOFIA again, as it likes to spend money we don’t have.
The goal of the increased funding for Artemis is also to continue the SLS program for many years to come. Expect Congress to also fund this in the coming few years, though the long term future of SLS remains in doubt, especially if SpaceX’s Starship begins flying. Artemis won’t be cancelled by our spendthrift Congress, but Congress will likely decide to shift that spending to Starship and other private rockets rather than SLS as those private rockets come on line.
All in all, expect Congress to give NASA more cash, but not as much as the agency requests.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
“Congress will likely decide to shift that spending to Starship and other private rockets rather than SLS as those private rockets come on line.”
Congress? The United States Congress? Maybe as a way to support Boeing and Lockheed, while SpaceX provides better service at lower cost. Let me know when somebody else’s rocket starts launching people and payloads to orbit, and then re-landing for another mission. I won’t be holding my breath.
Didn‘t they spend $25 Billion on the entire Apollo program? (I know it was in 1965 dollars, but still!) At least we got a return on the investment! What does $25 bil buy you today? Another year of delays piled on more delays! Nothing ever (or rarely) gets done. What a waste!
Anton Petrov’s youtube channel is of very high quality, in all my experience, when it comes to verifying sources. Here he summarizes the Chinese 5-year plan for their space program (unfortunately not many interplanetary probes beyond Mars, but otherwise pretty great):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92w-6pPptMU&t=1s
Another recent video of his daily paper based ones talks about Odd Radio Circles. So called because of the uncertainty of science, until that recent hypothesis which he explains was now introduced. Before that they were only identified as inexplicable odd circles of radio emissions in the images. These five things that were discovered only 3 years ago were utterly mysterious. Since the distance to them was unknown, their diameters were in traditional astronomical ways estimated to be between 2 light years and 2 MILLION light years. If I as a low level business manager would’ve made such a prognosis, my boss would’ve fired me as much as whatever thing caused these strange flames. That’s why I regret not having tried to become an astronomer.
“- Can you certainly exclude more than 2 million light years in diameter?”
“- As an astronomer I would NEVER exclude pi.”
“Congress will likely decide to shift that spending to Starship and other private rockets rather than SLS as those private rockets come on line.”
We can hope. But it won’t come easy. SpaceX doesn’t employ enough people in the right congressional districts.
David,
“Didn‘t they spend $25 Billion on the entire Apollo program? (I know it was in 1965 dollars, but still!)”
Casey Dreier of the Planetary Society just released a paper on that, actually. (It just cleared peer review). The total he came up with, adjusted to 2020 dollars, is $257 billion for all of Apollo. (On the other hand, he discovered that Apollo missions actually cost LESS than Artemis missions will.)
I still say NASA does a creditable job in what it delivers for most of its science programs. Yes, the flagship missions are more prone to cost overruns (Europa Clipper just took another hit this week), and yes, it’s overdue for NASA to consider more cost-effective, commercially oriented ways to do remote science, but . . . they’re still world class on planetary science and astrophysics. It shouldn’t surprise us that the programs where Congress has the most fingerprints are also the least cost effective.
P.S. Link for the Casey Dreier paper on Apollo here:
“An Improved Cost Analysis of the Apollo Program”
Casey Dreier
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0265964622000029
(It’s free to access.)
Bob—it’s the Stratospheric Observatory For Infrared Astronomy—SOFIA
But like Sophia Loren, it’s past it’s prime.
Concerned. Oy. I knew that. I just sometimes type first and think later. Fixed.