<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The backup computer that helps operate ISS&#8217;s robot arms is not responding to commands.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-backup-computer-that-helps-operate-isss-robot-arms-is-not-responding-to-commands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-backup-computer-that-helps-operate-isss-robot-arms-is-not-responding-to-commands/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:41:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kelly Starks		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-backup-computer-that-helps-operate-isss-robot-arms-is-not-responding-to-commands/#comment-164179</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly Starks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2014 13:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=28145#comment-164179</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-backup-computer-that-helps-operate-isss-robot-arms-is-not-responding-to-commands/#comment-164026&quot;&gt;Robert Zimmerman&lt;/a&gt;.

Could be embarrassing if they have to go out a hatch and lasso it and drag it in.  ;)

Dragon wranglers.  ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-backup-computer-that-helps-operate-isss-robot-arms-is-not-responding-to-commands/#comment-164026">Robert Zimmerman</a>.</p>
<p>Could be embarrassing if they have to go out a hatch and lasso it and drag it in.  ;)</p>
<p>Dragon wranglers.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Zimmerman		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-backup-computer-that-helps-operate-isss-robot-arms-is-not-responding-to-commands/#comment-164026</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Zimmerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=28145#comment-164026</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-backup-computer-that-helps-operate-isss-robot-arms-is-not-responding-to-commands/#comment-164006&quot;&gt;Pzatchok&lt;/a&gt;.

You need to understand the engineering designs here to understand what is going on.

1. Dragon is not designed to do a docking. It doesn&#039;t have the right kind of equipment to do the maneuver all by itself. It can rendezvous with the station however with great accuracy.

2. The backup computer that has failed specifically controls the position of the robot arm &lt;em&gt;on&lt;/em&gt; the truss, as does the primary computer that still works. Neither controls the arm itself or how it moves to grab things.

3. The berthing itself is done manually by an astronaut inside the station, operating the robot arm.

What they have done is to use the primary computer for sliding the robot arm along the truss to immediately move the arm to the correct position so that it can be operated by the astronauts to berth Dragon. With this done, the failure of the back-up computer is less critical, at least for the moment.

Dragon will arrive, as is normal, and astronauts will use the robot arm to grab and berth it, as is normal. It will not hang there in space.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-backup-computer-that-helps-operate-isss-robot-arms-is-not-responding-to-commands/#comment-164006">Pzatchok</a>.</p>
<p>You need to understand the engineering designs here to understand what is going on.</p>
<p>1. Dragon is not designed to do a docking. It doesn&#8217;t have the right kind of equipment to do the maneuver all by itself. It can rendezvous with the station however with great accuracy.</p>
<p>2. The backup computer that has failed specifically controls the position of the robot arm <em>on</em> the truss, as does the primary computer that still works. Neither controls the arm itself or how it moves to grab things.</p>
<p>3. The berthing itself is done manually by an astronaut inside the station, operating the robot arm.</p>
<p>What they have done is to use the primary computer for sliding the robot arm along the truss to immediately move the arm to the correct position so that it can be operated by the astronauts to berth Dragon. With this done, the failure of the back-up computer is less critical, at least for the moment.</p>
<p>Dragon will arrive, as is normal, and astronauts will use the robot arm to grab and berth it, as is normal. It will not hang there in space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pzatchok		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-backup-computer-that-helps-operate-isss-robot-arms-is-not-responding-to-commands/#comment-164006</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pzatchok]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:54:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=28145#comment-164006</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So does NASA giving the go ahead for the launch mean that Dragon can dock on its own?
I can&#039;t see how Dragon is so far behind the Russians craft in terms of tech that it can&#039;t dock on its own and the Russians can. Well the Russians at least don&#039;t need the arm to dock.

Or does it mean they will be able to use the arm?
Are they that sure that their repair effort will work?


Or are they just going to leave the cargo ship hanging out there until the Russians lift more replacement equipment up for us.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So does NASA giving the go ahead for the launch mean that Dragon can dock on its own?<br />
I can&#8217;t see how Dragon is so far behind the Russians craft in terms of tech that it can&#8217;t dock on its own and the Russians can. Well the Russians at least don&#8217;t need the arm to dock.</p>
<p>Or does it mean they will be able to use the arm?<br />
Are they that sure that their repair effort will work?</p>
<p>Or are they just going to leave the cargo ship hanging out there until the Russians lift more replacement equipment up for us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Edward		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-backup-computer-that-helps-operate-isss-robot-arms-is-not-responding-to-commands/#comment-163926</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 21:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=28145#comment-163926</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This morning on the radio, I heard the Heartbleed problem referred to as a major glitch.  I, too, considered a glitch as a small, temporary problem, but Dictionary.com describes it as any problem in a machine or program:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/glitch?s=t
1. a defect or malfunction in a machine or plan.
2. Computers.  any error, malfunction, or problem.  

Definition 3 may be where we got the idea that a glitch was a relatively minor thing.  &quot;a brief or sudden interruption or surge in voltage in an electric circuit.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning on the radio, I heard the Heartbleed problem referred to as a major glitch.  I, too, considered a glitch as a small, temporary problem, but Dictionary.com describes it as any problem in a machine or program:</p>
<p><a href="http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/glitch?s=t" rel="nofollow ugc">http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/glitch?s=t</a><br />
1. a defect or malfunction in a machine or plan.<br />
2. Computers.  any error, malfunction, or problem.  </p>
<p>Definition 3 may be where we got the idea that a glitch was a relatively minor thing.  &#8220;a brief or sudden interruption or surge in voltage in an electric circuit.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kelly Starks		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-backup-computer-that-helps-operate-isss-robot-arms-is-not-responding-to-commands/#comment-163794</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly Starks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 19:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=28145#comment-163794</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great so a critical system to &quot;berth&quot; Dragon, may be failing, and can&#039;t be fixed if it fails without equipment to be carried by Dragon.

The universe has a nasty sense of irony.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great so a critical system to &#8220;berth&#8221; Dragon, may be failing, and can&#8217;t be fixed if it fails without equipment to be carried by Dragon.</p>
<p>The universe has a nasty sense of irony.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stu Harris		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-backup-computer-that-helps-operate-isss-robot-arms-is-not-responding-to-commands/#comment-163786</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stu Harris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=28145#comment-163786</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Agree about &quot;glitch.&quot; A related non-word is &quot;typo&quot;, now used for any small text error. Its original meaning, of course, is an error that it not the author&#039;s fault because it was made by a typographer. These days authors are their own typographers, so a &quot;typo&quot; is just an &quot;error&quot;.

I&#039;ve seen it used for errors that go beyond mere spelling mistakes, too. When Mike Bara wrote  &quot;An annular eclipse means that the Moon and Sun are in perfect alignment, but the Sun is not totally blotted out because the Moon is a little too close to the Earth...&quot; (&#039;The Choice&#039;, p.214) he excused himself by claiming it was a mere &quot;typo.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree about &#8220;glitch.&#8221; A related non-word is &#8220;typo&#8221;, now used for any small text error. Its original meaning, of course, is an error that it not the author&#8217;s fault because it was made by a typographer. These days authors are their own typographers, so a &#8220;typo&#8221; is just an &#8220;error&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen it used for errors that go beyond mere spelling mistakes, too. When Mike Bara wrote  &#8220;An annular eclipse means that the Moon and Sun are in perfect alignment, but the Sun is not totally blotted out because the Moon is a little too close to the Earth&#8230;&#8221; (&#8216;The Choice&#8217;, p.214) he excused himself by claiming it was a mere &#8220;typo.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mpthompson		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-backup-computer-that-helps-operate-isss-robot-arms-is-not-responding-to-commands/#comment-163736</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mpthompson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2014 06:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=28145#comment-163736</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with you regarding the word &quot;glitch&quot;.  Rarely is a glitch ever a &quot;glitch&quot;.  Seems the word was used extensively in the media recently to describe the Obamacare web site as well.  

I&#039;m curious as to the nature of the computer controlling the arm on the ISS.  I presume it&#039;s a embedded system of some kind that really needs to be close proximity to the physical arm.  On one hand this is understandable, but on the other hand it seems to me that extraordinary efforts should be made to try and place such equipment in locations that don&#039;t actually require a spacewalk for access.  I guess I&#039;m being to optimistic that such critical computer systems can be made accessible in such a way on the ISS.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you regarding the word &#8220;glitch&#8221;.  Rarely is a glitch ever a &#8220;glitch&#8221;.  Seems the word was used extensively in the media recently to describe the Obamacare web site as well.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious as to the nature of the computer controlling the arm on the ISS.  I presume it&#8217;s a embedded system of some kind that really needs to be close proximity to the physical arm.  On one hand this is understandable, but on the other hand it seems to me that extraordinary efforts should be made to try and place such equipment in locations that don&#8217;t actually require a spacewalk for access.  I guess I&#8217;m being to optimistic that such critical computer systems can be made accessible in such a way on the ISS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
