<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Democratic Party&#8217;s proposed constitutional amendment to limit free speech.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-democratic-partys-proposed-constitutional-amendment-to-limit-free-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-democratic-partys-proposed-constitutional-amendment-to-limit-free-speech/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:17:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: John M. Egan		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-democratic-partys-proposed-constitutional-amendment-to-limit-free-speech/#comment-170619</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John M. Egan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2014 09:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=28740#comment-170619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Democratic Party should rename itself the Communist Party since they both believe in no freedom of speech!  How many Communist countries have Democratic in their name when their repressive government is anything but democratic?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democratic Party should rename itself the Communist Party since they both believe in no freedom of speech!  How many Communist countries have Democratic in their name when their repressive government is anything but democratic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ken anthony		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-democratic-partys-proposed-constitutional-amendment-to-limit-free-speech/#comment-170138</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ken anthony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 21:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=28740#comment-170138</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-democratic-partys-proposed-constitutional-amendment-to-limit-free-speech/#comment-170071&quot;&gt;Publius 2&lt;/a&gt;.

Why would non offensive speech need protection?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-democratic-partys-proposed-constitutional-amendment-to-limit-free-speech/#comment-170071">Publius 2</a>.</p>
<p>Why would non offensive speech need protection?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Publius 2		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-democratic-partys-proposed-constitutional-amendment-to-limit-free-speech/#comment-170071</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Publius 2]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 00:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=28740#comment-170071</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We now live in a society where many people believe that &quot;offensive&quot; speech must be prohibited, even though that definition is being applied hypocritically. But our founders knew, as perhaps more people will again realize with time, that offensive speech must be protected, because if it is not, it becomes the path to tyranny -- which is where we have arrived.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We now live in a society where many people believe that &#8220;offensive&#8221; speech must be prohibited, even though that definition is being applied hypocritically. But our founders knew, as perhaps more people will again realize with time, that offensive speech must be protected, because if it is not, it becomes the path to tyranny &#8212; which is where we have arrived.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: wodun		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-democratic-partys-proposed-constitutional-amendment-to-limit-free-speech/#comment-170061</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wodun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2014 20:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=28740#comment-170061</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We have come a long way from the idea that freedom of speech is so important that it must apply to the most objectionable things like masturbating in libraries and burning flags.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have come a long way from the idea that freedom of speech is so important that it must apply to the most objectionable things like masturbating in libraries and burning flags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
