<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The next two Vulcan launches for the Pentagon slip to 2025	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-next-two-vulcan-launches-for-the-pentagon-slip-to-2025/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-next-two-vulcan-launches-for-the-pentagon-slip-to-2025/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 18:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ronaldus Magnus		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-next-two-vulcan-launches-for-the-pentagon-slip-to-2025/#comment-1532591</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronaldus Magnus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 18:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=110126#comment-1532591</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Imagine where the United States of America would be without Elon Musk and SpaceX.  The Falcon Heavy is used for larger payloads. Now that Super Heavy Booster is essentially operational, it could help put sensitive payloads into orbit. We look forward to, at least, 25 Starship Super Heavy launches/tests in 2025. (Oh my, upon typing the numbers 2025, Zager &#038; Evans one hit is playing in my mind)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine where the United States of America would be without Elon Musk and SpaceX.  The Falcon Heavy is used for larger payloads. Now that Super Heavy Booster is essentially operational, it could help put sensitive payloads into orbit. We look forward to, at least, 25 Starship Super Heavy launches/tests in 2025. (Oh my, upon typing the numbers 2025, Zager &amp; Evans one hit is playing in my mind)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray Van Dune		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-next-two-vulcan-launches-for-the-pentagon-slip-to-2025/#comment-1532583</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Van Dune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 16:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=110126#comment-1532583</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Though the second launch got its payload to its correct orbit, during launch the nozzle on one of its strap-on solid-fueled boosters fell off.&quot;

IMHO, ANY structural failure in a solid-fuel rocket motor is a potential (and likely) catastrophic mission-ending event. That the Vulcan got its payload to orbit should inspire attendance at church more than product satisfaction, and I suspect that the USSF knows that full well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Though the second launch got its payload to its correct orbit, during launch the nozzle on one of its strap-on solid-fueled boosters fell off.&#8221;</p>
<p>IMHO, ANY structural failure in a solid-fuel rocket motor is a potential (and likely) catastrophic mission-ending event. That the Vulcan got its payload to orbit should inspire attendance at church more than product satisfaction, and I suspect that the USSF knows that full well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
