<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The scrub of this week&#8217;s Falcon Heavy launch of X-37B	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-scrub-of-this-weeks-falcon-heavy-launch-of-x-37b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-scrub-of-this-weeks-falcon-heavy-launch-of-x-37b/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 04:45:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Wright		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-scrub-of-this-weeks-falcon-heavy-launch-of-x-37b/#comment-1436880</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2023 04:45:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=101075#comment-1436880</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That or they waited for the Chinese space plane to launch first.

They could be rolling it back lights out maybe?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That or they waited for the Chinese space plane to launch first.</p>
<p>They could be rolling it back lights out maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: geoffc		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-scrub-of-this-weeks-falcon-heavy-launch-of-x-37b/#comment-1436845</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geoffc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 20:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=101075#comment-1436845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I saw an interesting note about a coming lunar mission, might be delayed, since it needs LC-39A since that is the only pad that fuel the payload, on the pad. 

I suspect that the X-37B needs fueling on the pad.  Likely it uses hypergolics, since it has such a long mission life, and wonder if it is that GSE that has the issue.  This is not a feature they use often, maybe Dragon and a few other payloads.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw an interesting note about a coming lunar mission, might be delayed, since it needs LC-39A since that is the only pad that fuel the payload, on the pad. </p>
<p>I suspect that the X-37B needs fueling on the pad.  Likely it uses hypergolics, since it has such a long mission life, and wonder if it is that GSE that has the issue.  This is not a feature they use often, maybe Dragon and a few other payloads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MDN		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-scrub-of-this-weeks-falcon-heavy-launch-of-x-37b/#comment-1436831</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MDN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Dec 2023 18:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=101075#comment-1436831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It could be almost anything. That said it is worth pointing out that Falcon Heavy is itself a relatively new system with less than 10 flights under its belt. Add to that the fact that as I understand it this mission is supposed to boost the X37 to a new and much more ambitious orbital profile and margins that may normally be quite adequate could easily be much less so..

The key rake away to me is that SpaceX is showing the professional discipline required to minimize undue risk. Had only NASA been as careful with the MANNED shuttle program QA both the Challenger and Columbia accidents never would have happened. And given their plan to send humans all the way to lunar orbit on the very first Artemis mission with a fully integrated life support system makes me fear they still lack such discipline.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be almost anything. That said it is worth pointing out that Falcon Heavy is itself a relatively new system with less than 10 flights under its belt. Add to that the fact that as I understand it this mission is supposed to boost the X37 to a new and much more ambitious orbital profile and margins that may normally be quite adequate could easily be much less so..</p>
<p>The key rake away to me is that SpaceX is showing the professional discipline required to minimize undue risk. Had only NASA been as careful with the MANNED shuttle program QA both the Challenger and Columbia accidents never would have happened. And given their plan to send humans all the way to lunar orbit on the very first Artemis mission with a fully integrated life support system makes me fear they still lack such discipline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
