<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The unfinished search for the Hubble constant	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-unfinished-search-for-the-hubble-constant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-unfinished-search-for-the-hubble-constant/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 16:28:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: wayne		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/the-unfinished-search-for-the-hubble-constant/#comment-1063811</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2019 16:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=56143#comment-1063811</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great (science) Topic!
(hoping armchair cosmologist&#039;s will wade into this over the weekend!)

A nice little backgrounder 

A New Measurement of the Expansion Rate of the Universe
Adam Reiss
CfA Colloquium (Harvard) 2017
https://youtu.be/eSPCy-IJaPg
59:46

As for the political spin the science-types are now engaging in, on a more regular basis-- I attribute this to ignorance, arrogance, and an agenda at play.

If I have this correctly; it took a relatively (pun intended) short time between Einstein&#039;s General Theory and Hubble&#039;s original proposition (1915 to the 1930&#039;s) and then it took another 50 years to achieve an order of magnitude in precision for the expansion rate. I hardly think they are done with the task.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great (science) Topic!<br />
(hoping armchair cosmologist&#8217;s will wade into this over the weekend!)</p>
<p>A nice little backgrounder </p>
<p>A New Measurement of the Expansion Rate of the Universe<br />
Adam Reiss<br />
CfA Colloquium (Harvard) 2017<br />
<a href="https://youtu.be/eSPCy-IJaPg" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/eSPCy-IJaPg</a><br />
59:46</p>
<p>As for the political spin the science-types are now engaging in, on a more regular basis&#8211; I attribute this to ignorance, arrogance, and an agenda at play.</p>
<p>If I have this correctly; it took a relatively (pun intended) short time between Einstein&#8217;s General Theory and Hubble&#8217;s original proposition (1915 to the 1930&#8217;s) and then it took another 50 years to achieve an order of magnitude in precision for the expansion rate. I hardly think they are done with the task.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
