Comments on: Today’s blacklisted American: Anti-religion group insists college football coaches have no 1st amendment rights

By: GWB

GWB — Thu, 05 Oct 2023 13:45:04 +0000

They are anti-Christian, not anti-religious. Progressivism's god is their own mind and ego. The fact it's not an idol of wood or metal or "some sky-god" does not make it "not a religion."

By: Blair Ivey

Blair Ivey — Wed, 04 Oct 2023 17:55:53 +0000

Good luck silencing Coach Prime on *anything*.

By: Cotour

Cotour — Wed, 04 Oct 2023 13:26:02 +0000

“The Republican governor, Kay Ivey, called FFRF’s objections “misleading and misguided” as she defended Freeze’s right to practice HIS religion.”

Isn’t there a distinction here where HE can practice HIS religion as an individual.

That is his internal personal belief system, but is he instilling HIS personal internal religious belief system on those under his direction?

If a coach wants to stop for a moment of personal expression of his beliefs on the field and say a prayer, that is one thing.

However, if he insists his players do the same then he would be coercing them into his personal system of religious belief.

Why the distinction? The Constitution ensures an INDIVIDUALS Rights.

https://www.sigma3ioc.com/post/god-spirituality-v-politics-law-and-justice-commerce-religion

By: SDN

SDN — Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:58:52 +0000

And in an obviously related ploy, Justice Barrett is being set up to be demanded she recuse:

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2023/10/03/amy-coney-barretts-christian-group-targeted-by-federal-agents-1401139

““Several individuals” have contacted the Federal Bureau of Investigations about abuses by the Christian group that Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett has been a lifelong member of.

That’s according to The Guardian, which cited “sources familiar with the matter” to report the bureau has interviewed complainants alleging “they were abused by members of the People of Praise,” which the newspaper described as a “secretive Christian sect” — the left, to include many in the media, have long attacked the group for supporting traditional gender roles in families.”

By: BillB

BillB — Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:13:10 +0000

I am always amazed at the mental gymnastics the FFRF go through. I would not be surprised to see them start to sue political office holders and government employees for having any connection to a religion, as it would taint those peoples’ decision making in their farcial view of the 1st Amendment.

By: Michael Lee

Michael Lee — Tue, 03 Oct 2023 22:09:42 +0000

I really do wish people would read the establishment clause if full. That semi colon is not a period. The government shall not pass any law establishing a religon; nor interfere with the practice tehre of. That is why the Supreme Court ruled incorrectly. So I guess if a vending machine held Pepsi products; by their thinking Pepsi is the established soft grink of the Federal government