Pfizer executive, Australia: “No one was forced to get the vaccine”.

(And Joe Biden never spoke with his son about his “business”, even when he flew on Airforce 2 to China with him and came home with a $1 billion dollar hedge fund “investment” from the CCP. Or Burisma. Now that is a more better reality, no?)

Pfizer claims no one was forced to get the Jab – https://youtu.be/Vm9dfzGt9FI

A new more better reality all in 58 seconds.

Pure brute force Strategy, no Morality. And its right in your face. YOU are crazy, not them.

I must have missed this more better reality because the reality that I observed all around me for going on 3 years was people being terrified and mis informed by their government, big pharma and big tech social media, denied free speech and proven drug therapies and were told plainly that if they did not get the experimental mRNA “vaccine” jab they were to lose their jobs! Is it me?

NO, ITS NOT ME!

Are you beginning to understand? How stupid are we all required to be? Pretty damn stupid apparently. Funny, my mother did not raise me to be stupid, how about yours?

Are you paying attention yet America? JGL 8/8/23

https://www.sigma3ioc.com/post/a-more-better-reality

There were several centuries of learning that went out the window in the course of five months (mid January to mid June, 2020). Since the schools are no longer teaching critical thinking skills, how-to-think rather than the what-to-think that is taught now, we really cannot expect the current younger generations to do any better in the future.

The lesson learned here was learned by the government, that it can get a majority of people to do things that are obviously against their best interests — even dangerous.

It wasn’t just medical lessons and critical thinking lessons that went out the window (were defenestrated) but lessons in how to perform science in an accurate manner. One of the worst problems resulting from this is people thinking that their own observations are truth — rather than using these observations to set a hypothesis to be tested, they use their anecdotal evidence as proof positive of their own biases. A heat wave passes through the area, and several people declare that global warming (not climate change) must be true — a cold front comes through, and no declaration of the coming ice age, because that stopped being a concern, despite an ice age being due any millennium, now. Less snow is proof of global warming, but so is more snow. Small P values are proof that a paper’s conclusion is correct, because it is the opposite of the truism that a larger P value shows the data does not support the conclusion — the fallacy that if large says “no,” then small must necessarily mean “yes.” Searching for correlations that prove a point, then finding a dataset that produces a small P value. (Summer causes drownings — small P value. Except that it is swimming that is closer to the cause of drownings, but the real cause is related to an inability to swim without drowning.)

The “pandemic,” which was nothing compared with several other outbreaks in the past century or so, had government reactions that violated virtually everything we knew to do about an outbreak. The reaction caused far more damage than it saved, based upon our policymakers’ own model that they told us they used to establish that reaction — the reaction to violate centuries of lessons learned. According to that model, we should have had only 60,000 deaths in the U.S. by sheltering in place for two weeks, and the Wuhan flu should have been over by the end of August. However, the ultimate reaction was a two-year shelter in place, and more than 1,000,000 deaths were attributed to the Wuhan flu.

Rick Bravo: You have the right to your opinions, but not to facts. I cited FOUR different papers documenting the rise in myocarditis. I could cite more. All you have is your belief, which is not how rational science is performed.

It is not about learning, it is ultimately about control.

https://youtu.be/XTclTVHxAEs

Forcing an entire population to do as they are told and have an experimental drug injected into their bodies even if they want to choose “other” more established means of dealing with a virus.

And it IMO further became the fulfilling of billion$ in agreed upon contracts to supply an experiential drug to the public paid for by government, and with no liability in establishing that *NEW* technology for those who supplied that experimental drug.

A bigger live biological experiment has never before been undertaken by man. All primarily without informed consent.

Can you say Nuremburg?

The only thing that can damage that reputation would be something like publicly attacking a medical doctor for raising scientific questions about a new drug or treatment.

Andi: Thank you again!

This is a big deal.