<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: TSA removes its head of security	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/tsa-removes-its-head-of-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/tsa-removes-its-head-of-security/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 22:20:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Edward		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/tsa-removes-its-head-of-security/#comment-890661</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2016 22:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=39357#comment-890661</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This may make me feel safer, in the future.  I realized years ago that the long lines -- bunched up into crowds of people -- prior to the nipple-squeeze/porn-o-vision security sweep was a vulnerability, and Belgium proved it, earlier this year.  Thus, if the next head of The Security Abatement (TSA) makes these lines shorter or otherwise less insecure, then perhaps we will be safer after all.  

It is one thing to be inconvenienced by missing an expensive and possibly important flight; that is bad enough.  It is another thing to be blown to bits at the security station that is supposed to protect you from being blown to bits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may make me feel safer, in the future.  I realized years ago that the long lines &#8212; bunched up into crowds of people &#8212; prior to the nipple-squeeze/porn-o-vision security sweep was a vulnerability, and Belgium proved it, earlier this year.  Thus, if the next head of The Security Abatement (TSA) makes these lines shorter or otherwise less insecure, then perhaps we will be safer after all.  </p>
<p>It is one thing to be inconvenienced by missing an expensive and possibly important flight; that is bad enough.  It is another thing to be blown to bits at the security station that is supposed to protect you from being blown to bits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
