<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ULA gets three launch contracts	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/ula-gets-three-launch-contracts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/ula-gets-three-launch-contracts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 07:10:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dick Eagleson		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/ula-gets-three-launch-contracts/#comment-976967</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Eagleson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 07:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=44977#comment-976967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not another hundred.  ULA&#039;s combined reliability record is a composite of Atlas V, Delta IV, Delta IV Heavy and Delta 2.  It&#039;s currently somewhere near 120 consecutive successes.  But Atlas V only accounts for about 70 of those.  I think Ariane 5 has a slightly longer success streak at this point.  Both records are eminently beatable, but it will take SpaceX at least two or three more years to do it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not another hundred.  ULA&#8217;s combined reliability record is a composite of Atlas V, Delta IV, Delta IV Heavy and Delta 2.  It&#8217;s currently somewhere near 120 consecutive successes.  But Atlas V only accounts for about 70 of those.  I think Ariane 5 has a slightly longer success streak at this point.  Both records are eminently beatable, but it will take SpaceX at least two or three more years to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LocalFluff		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/ula-gets-three-launch-contracts/#comment-976834</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LocalFluff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 07:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=44977#comment-976834</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Falcon 9 puts 23 tons in orbit, Atlas 5-551 does 19 tons. The &quot;block buy&quot; seems to be about 36 launches for $164 million each. $102 million more than for a falcon 9 list price. Maybe they&#039;ve got to &quot;use up&quot; their 36 Atlas launches? Because price competitive it is not so much. Maybe SpaceX bid for higher than normal prices? Could be that Atlas&#039; remarkable reliability is crucial. It takes another hundred F9 launches to beat it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_V#Cost]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Falcon 9 puts 23 tons in orbit, Atlas 5-551 does 19 tons. The &#8220;block buy&#8221; seems to be about 36 launches for $164 million each. $102 million more than for a falcon 9 list price. Maybe they&#8217;ve got to &#8220;use up&#8221; their 36 Atlas launches? Because price competitive it is not so much. Maybe SpaceX bid for higher than normal prices? Could be that Atlas&#8217; remarkable reliability is crucial. It takes another hundred F9 launches to beat it.<br />
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_V#Cost" rel="nofollow ugc">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlas_V#Cost</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
