Comments on: Universe’s most massive star is found to be less massive than previously believed https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/universes-most-massive-star-is-found-to-be-less-massive-than-previously-believed/ Sat, 20 Aug 2022 00:46:27 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: wayne https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/universes-most-massive-star-is-found-to-be-less-massive-than-previously-believed/#comment-1346627 Sat, 20 Aug 2022 00:46:27 +0000 https://behindtheblack.com/?p=87498#comment-1346627 Stellar Physics 4b:
Maximum Star Mass*
Physics Almanac (July, 2022)
https://youtu.be/5Tr0JSQlXUk
12:47

[* subject to revision…]

]]> By: GaryMike https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/universes-most-massive-star-is-found-to-be-less-massive-than-previously-believed/#comment-1346624 Sat, 20 Aug 2022 00:29:07 +0000 https://behindtheblack.com/?p=87498#comment-1346624 I’m thinking their is no actual upper mass. I’m thinking that there is an upper mass for stars still able to be observed because they are still gravitationally compacted.

]]> By: Col Beausabre https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/universes-most-massive-star-is-found-to-be-less-massive-than-previously-believed/#comment-1346530 Fri, 19 Aug 2022 18:07:13 +0000 https://behindtheblack.com/?p=87498#comment-1346530 See this https://www.space.com/858-study-stars-size-limit.html

]]> By: johnd01 https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/universes-most-massive-star-is-found-to-be-less-massive-than-previously-believed/#comment-1346474 Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:54:08 +0000 https://behindtheblack.com/?p=87498#comment-1346474 This is probably a dumb question but, why would there be an upper limit?

]]>