I thank you for the kind words about what I said. To be honest I don’t remember the specifics. To get the exact words, one would have to obtain a transcript of my appearance from C2C, or listen to their podcast.

I’ll ask them if I can get a podcast. You’ve made me curious to hear what I said myself. :)

I was referring more to what you said AFTER you stated that (what you referred me to).
You went on a minute long ‘fugue’ about how God is beyond what we can know, and to think that we could pin him down, etc.
As I said, it was a ‘fugue’ and it was beautiful, but hard to remember, as it was ‘fugue-ish’ / poetic (although you said it so clearly and so beautifully even though it dealt with the most subtle of topics).
The reason I wrote to you about ‘how God and science are not rivals’ was because that was easy to remember (prosaic); but what I really wanted to here restated was the poetic part AFTER that.
After all, that they are not rivals is standard fare; but what you said AFTER that was one of a kind and transcendent, although they go together somehow.

Thanks.

See this comment.