With all due respect, Dude, it’s entirely reasonable to comment on a notable lack of either or both Pilgrims and American Indians in illustrations purporting to be of the first Thanksgiving. Other fact-based departures from the reality of those times are also fair game. I wasn’t commenting on anything subjective.

Me love you long time…GIGO #1
https://x.com/Dr_Singularity/status/1994071579836170318

https://x.com/i/grok

Actually, compared to numbers 5 through 8, number two looks almost reasonable. At least number 2 has one pretty readily-identifiable American Indian in-frame. Numbers 5 – 8, not so much.

The two items of PRC origin, 5 and 7, are the ones widest of the mark. Neither contains any readily identifiable Pilgrims or American Indians. Both look like uni-ethnic gatherings of late-Medieval or Early-Renaissance European peasants, number 5 from the Caucasus or perhaps the Eurasian steppe and number 7 from somewhere in Mittle-Europa.

The food is ahistoric too, pretty much across the board. The corn looks like giant present-day hybrid types and the turkeys are also modern selectively-bred birds and not the much smaller and scrawnier wild birds of the actual era. And I have no idea what that main course in number 7 is. It is certainly no turkey. A giant bread loaf of some kind perhaps?

As has proven frequently the case in recent years, these AI-generated tableaux prove that, while actual artificial intelligence still eludes us, the supply of artificial stupidity/cluelessness is very much in oversupply.