Scroll down to read this post.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. I keep the website clean from pop-ups and annoying demands. Instead, I depend entirely on my readers to support me. Though this means I am sacrificing some income, it also means that I remain entirely independent from outside pressure. By depending solely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, no one can threaten me with censorship. You don't like what I write, you can simply go elsewhere.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.


New power source for planetary missions?

Research at JPL has developed new materials called skutterudites that have the potential of increasing the efficiency and power output of the radioisotope electric generators used on deep space missions where solar power will not work.

The new eMMRTG would provide 25 percent more power than Curiosity’s generator at the start of a mission, according to current analyses. Additionally, since skutterudites naturally degrade more slowly that the current materials in the MMRTG, a spacecraft outfitted with an eMMRTG would have at least 50 percent more power at the end of a 17-year design life than it does today.

“Having a more efficient thermoelectric system means we’d need to use less plutonium. We could go farther, for longer and do more,” Bux said.

This being NASA research, they are moving somewhat slowly in testing and confirming whether these new materials will work. They hope that after passing further reviews in 2017 and 2018 the agency might finally approve their use in subsequent missions.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 
The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

3 comments

  • Localfluff

    I understand that Curiosity only enjoys 1/6 of a horse power electric power. For all its movements and all it’s instruments. Most of the decaying plutonium in its RTG just produces heat (which is also necessary to keep stuff working). 25% increase of that would give a Curiosity rover 1/5 or 1/4 of a horse power. It’d still be a sloth. But it’s a big leap for a sloth…

    Imagine what a real nuclear power plant could accomplish there! Or a grand sailing ship rig of solar panels on top of a rover. And imagine what’s required for bringing planetary scientists there, of the human kind.

  • Tom Billings

    “Imagine what a real nuclear power plant could accomplish there! Or a grand sailing ship rig of solar panels on top of a rover. And imagine what’s required for bringing planetary scientists there, of the human kind.”

    Better yet, emplacing in Mars orbit a series of Solar Dynamic Power Satellites of around 10 megawatts, (the minimum size for a Super-Critical CO2 turbine unit) that could use microwaves to beam down power to a much lighter weight rectenna array the rover could unroll periodically to recharge batteries, would allow nearly constant travel at rates far higher than currently. This would, however, imply that we were serious about settling Mars, since building larger Power Sats from Martian In Situ Resources would become probable. That is not politically profitable, so no NASA money will be allocated by Congress.

    Worse, it would be an exemplum for what could be done in orbit around Earth, stealing the thunder of the Green Parties and their equivalents. That won’t be talked about even by private companies until its about to happen, so that the opposition won’t have time to build up mometum over “irradiating Mars with Microwaves”. The greenies just cannot have the idea of a technical solution to their scare program demonstrated, or their donor’s investments will tank.

  • Localfluff

    10 MWe is almost 100 times the Solar array of the ISS. But Boeing say they plan building 1 MW Solar arrays for com sats, so these things seem realistic. Beamed power is a neglected research subject. Probably because it isn’t very practical and safe on Earth. Doesn’t seem to be any magic involved. Maybe there’s sense in have one huge Solar array in GEO (above e.g. the US) that beams power to many communication satellites around it. Space is made for wireless.

    And we’ll just tell the greenies that that gadget at Mars is necessary for protecting Earth from Niburu.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *