Physicists shrink their next big accelerator

Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar to the right. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

Because of high costs and a refocus in research goals, physicists have reduced the size of their proposed next big particle accelerator, which they hope will be built in Japan.

On 7 November, the International Committee for Future Accelerators (ICFA), which oversees work on the ILC, endorsed halving the machine’s planned energy from 500 to 250 gigaelectronvolts (GeV), and shortening its proposed 33.5-kilometre-long tunnel by as much as 13 kilometres. The scaled-down version would have to forego some of its planned research such as studies of the ‘top’ flavour of quark, which is produced only at higher energies.

Instead, the collider would focus on studying the particle that endows all others with mass — the Higgs boson, which was detected in 2012 by the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, Europe’s particle-physics lab near Geneva, Switzerland.

Part of the reason for these changes is that the Large Hadron Collider has not discovered any new particles, other than the Higgs Boson. The cost to discover any remaining theorized particles was judged as simply too high. Better to focus on studying the Higgs Boson itself.



  • Cotour

    Is it wise to build such a thing on Japan which is seismically active and exists on the ring of fire?

    If I am writing the check I might be concerned about such things.

  • LocalFluff

    I wonder if they can make better use of cosmic rays that have very much higher energy than any accelerator humans can ever build. Among all the speculations about commercialization of space, it being an extreme laboratory is the most valuable thing imagined. It is only thanks to space that we have physics and industry at all. Without planets, no one would ever have thought of gravity and thus forces and engines. And planets were only the beginning.

  • Mitch S

    So are they essentially saying that the LHC has done what it could and it’s unlikely to produce much significant new data?
    Could the LHC tunnel be refitted for electron-positron collisions at a lower cost than building an entire new facility?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *