Scroll down to read this post.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. I keep the website clean from pop-ups and annoying demands. Instead, I depend entirely on my readers to support me. Though this means I am sacrificing some income, it also means that I remain entirely independent from outside pressure. By depending solely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, no one can threaten me with censorship. You don't like what I write, you can simply go elsewhere.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.


SpaceX launches commercial satellite

Capitalism in space: SpaceX today successfully launched a commercial communications satellite, only two weeks after its previous launch.

They hope to launch again in two weeks, and then two weeks after that, and then two weeks after that, again. In fact, they presently have four launches listed for June. If they succeed, they will be well on the way to clearing their launch backlog.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 
The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

9 comments

  • Edward

    I count 14 planned SpaceX payload launches for the rest of the year plus one Falcon Heavy (payload-less) demonstration flight. Add that to the six Falcon launches so far this year, and SpaceX will have 20 or 21 launches for the year. Wikipedia reports that the Wall Street Journal (at one time) expected 27 launches for this year and that SpaceX president Shotwell hopes for at least 20.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches#Future_launches

    I remain hopeful that SpaceX will soon reach their desired launch cadence. Perhaps Blue Origin will develop a similar cadence with New Glenn.

  • Edward: If SpaceX manages more than 20 flights, which has been their goal this year, they will more or less match what both the entire U.S. as well as China each accomplished last year. With the other U.S. launches, this would likely make the U.S. lead in yearly launches well ahead of every other nation for the first time since the late 1990s.

  • LocalFluff

    83 orbital launches last year, weren’t there? SpaceX could almost match that alone next year if they do it every other week, since the Falcon 9 is the largest launcher around except for the rare Delta IV Heavy and the once launched Long March 5. Soyuz for example only takes a quarter the mass of an F9. India’s rockets are even smaller. And 9 of last years launches were F9.

    A single company almost achieving a majority of the mass to orbit per year. In competition with all shadowy military projects with unlimited budgets. And making a profit off of it!

  • Joe From Houston

    Amazing feats of rocketry. The turnaround kills the competition. Good job reporting.

  • Alex

    No first stage landing?

  • Richard M

    “No first stage landing?”

    The GSO orbit for the Inmarsat satellite demanded too much fuel to make recovery an option. It demanded nearly every last ounce of performance an F9 can deliver now.

    In fact, this flight was originally slated for a Falcon Heavy. It’s a mark of how much SpaceX has been able to increase the F9 performance that it can now take on a payload like this.

  • Alex

    @Richard M: Unbelievable, SpaceX achieved a payload mass fraction (of total launch mass) for its F9, which is comparable to a launcher which use liquid hydrogen (at least) in its upper stages (as Saturn V or Delta IV heavy for example). This for an all kerosene fueled launcher not yet seen, very high value of 4.1 % is achieved by extreme large propellant mass fraction (=extreme light weight stage structures).

  • ken anthony

    Imagine what they’ll do when they have more operational launch facilities?

    I still worry they will leave their competition in the dust. That could be very unhealthy long term and they are building momentum now. The deep pockets of their rivals may allow them to compete if they get their acts together. Opening up a growing mars colony will greatly expand the need for more launches with a huge potential return. It’s time to expand the economic sphere to solar system proportions (or at least get a start. Opportunity cost is huge.)

  • Edward

    ken anthony wrote: “I still worry they will leave their competition in the dust. That could be very unhealthy long term

    I think that this would be healthy long term, but a problem for the competition short term. The competition would have to adapt or quit, and Blue Origin is already adapting to the reusable rocket paradigm. India is working on their own reusable launch vehicle (RLV). Others are adapting to reusable engines in order to compete.

    It is generally believed that as launch prices fall, more companies, countries, and universities will have greater incentive to launch satellites, probes, space laboratories, and people. It makes sense from a basic economics viewpoint, and it is good in the long term.

    The UK’s Skylon, if it works as intended, may leave SpaceX, Blue Origin, India, and the others in the dust, but that will drive companies into yet another direction of more efficiency. In the long run, even Skylon is good for the industry.

    The RLV is undergoing a revival, after the failure of the RLV in the 1990s.
    http://spacenews.com/reviving-the-aerospace-plane-program/

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *