Scroll down to read this post.

 

Readers!

 

The time has come for my annual short pre-Thanksgiving/Christmas fund drive for Behind The Black. I must do this every year in order to make sure I have earned enough money to pay my bills.

 

For this two-week campaign, I am offering a special deal to encourage donations. Donations of $200 will get a free autographed copy of the new paperback edition of Genesis: The Story of Apollo 8, while donations of $250 will get a free autographed copy of the new hardback edition. If you desire a copy, make sure you provide me your address with your donation.

 

As I noted in July, the support of my readers through the years has given me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.

 

In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.

 

Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:

 

4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


High speed Falcon 9 first stage camera view

SpaceX has released a high speed version of the camera view taken from the camera mounted on the Falcon 9 first stage that successfully landed on a barge on Friday.

I have embedded that video below the fold. Quite entertaining, though it emphasizes how much the flight resembles a high speed roller coaster ride.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon. from any other book seller, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

10 comments

  • Alex

    Again, a great stuff and achievement. I am congratulating to Elon Musk and his SpaceX engineers. NASA stands blank. An important question arises: Why did NASA not developed this method/technology itself already a long time ago and supplied it to launcher industry?

  • wodun

    NASA sometimes works on developing technology but they rely a lot on companies to build things they want. They can’t compete with the imagination and innovation of free Americans pursuing their interests.

    But why hasn’t this been done before? We live in a time where there is a confluence of maturing and developing technologies that have allowed this to happen. Computer programing, materials sciences, design, 3D printing, communications, are all just a few areas that were not ready in the past to do what they can today. Even the barge is a mixture of really old, recently matured, and new technology.

    NASA has been on the cutting edge of technological development but they are not well suited to incorporating different technologies and industries on a scale like this or able to change their course to implement anything should one of their employees have a good idea.

  • enginemike

    Be interesting to see it at normal speed.

    Is there anyway to slow down a you tube video?

  • enginemike

    I just found out that if you go to the setting button in the video you can select a speed of .25 that puts the video into a more realistic mode.

    Learn something every day.

  • Gary

    The deceleration Gs must be substantial and simultaneously exacting.
    Quite amazing.

  • Alex

    The video is about 10-times too fast. A good measure is the reentry-burn duration, which was in real time 20 seconds.

  • Edward

    Alex asked: “Why did NASA not developed this method/technology itself already a long time ago and supplied it to launcher industry?”

    NASA and other rocket engineers had previously concluded that the stresses and heat placed on a first stage during its reentry would damage it too much to make it economically reusable.

    Either the SpaceX engineers disagreed, or they decided that new materials and techniques were available to allow for first stage reusability at a reasonable refurbishment cost.

    Since SpaceX has not yet reused a first stage, we cannot be certain that they are right, but now that they have had time to analyse some returned rockets, they still seem confident that their first stages are economically reusable.

  • Tom Billings

    “Why did NASA not developed this method/technology itself already a long time ago and supplied it to launcher industry?”

    Doing so would have required NASA to focus on technology development as their main thrust of activity. Instead, they were involved from the start of NASA in countering Kruschev’s space propaganda offensive from 1957-1968. During that time, the Congress members who approve NASA’s budget learned to use it to enhance their careers, by directing money to political allies and dependents.

    Funding NASA programs for a 15 years long program of developing incrementally cheaper rockets to be reusable (This is how long it is taking SpaceX, since its founding.) would have done nothing to enhance the political careers of these members sitting in Congress. Indeed, the many small efforts needed to do this would have required them to expend many more favors owed them by other members of Congress, for the votes of those other members, than would single large programs like the Space Shuttle, and Constellation, Aries, etc. Thus, they made clear to NASA that they would support large “inspiring” programs, that concentrated money in their districts and States. This was obvious to NASA management by 1972, when Apollo ended.

    Every once in a while, NASA tries to sneek into the budget tech development funding for tech to make spaceflight cheaper, but such programs are persistently trimmed back by Congress, to feed the money into the large programs they favor, like SLS and Orion.

  • Alex

    Tom Billings & Edward: Thank you both for good comments. Tom: Your comment remind me to statements from Dr. Jeff Bell. I think you desribed the basic illness of space politics very well.

  • Edward

    To expand on wodun’s comment: “They can’t compete with the imagination and innovation of free Americans pursuing their interests.”

    It is better to have 300 million Americans (or 7 billion people worldwide) try new things than to rely upon a centrally controlled committee. The committee is limited in its imagination and its resources. With the population free to innovate its own ideas, it gets to use the resources of the whole population.

    When people rely only upon government, they will only get what the government wants them to have. When the people rely upon themselves and each other, they get what they want or can make. The difference between Venezuela 30 years ago and Venezuela today makes my point.

    The difference between US commercial space 30 years ago and US commercial space today also makes my point.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *