Because I led a cave trip yesterday (and was also the oldest person on the trip by at least two decades), I am kind of beat today. I might get some energy later in the day to write up a blacklist column, but right now I don’t have the mental strength to do it.

So instead, I am reposting my voting recommendations for Arizona. While these recommendations cover the statewide elections, they are also tailored to my specific location in Pima County in southern Arizona. If you are in Arizona but in a different county you will simply have to do some of your own research. O the horror!

——————————
Who and What to vote for in Arizona in 2022

The citizen is sovereign, and your vote demonstrates that power

I first posted my election choices in Arizona on October 11, 2022, the day before the start of early mail-in voting in this state. However, I am now posting my choices again because there were two propositions (#128 and #130) then that I was unsure about how I wished to vote. I have now done a bit more research, and made my choices. I think my analysis will be useful to my readers.

I have also included more information about the candidates running.

I want to once again emphasize that though I am not partisan, based on the steady decline of thought in the Democratic Party combined with its increased passion for arresting and violently harassing its opposition, I cannot at present vote for anyone in that party. I wish this was not the case, but I also believe strongly that if American voters throw out as many Democrats as possible in November, it will allow for that party to reform itself. With the defeat of its present leadership, the party will be faced with a stark choice: find new leaders, shift gears, or die (allowing a new party to replace it). With any of these options, the voters would be provided with a new choice in future elections, coming from a different direction.

As a perfect example of the mindless corruption that has now taken over the Democratic Party, witness President Joe Biden’s statement this past weekend throwing his full support behind the castration and mutilation of children in order to change their sex, as advocated by the “trans” movement — which in plain English is a movement of cross-dressers demanding more power over everyone else.

The president denounced Republican states that have passed laws attempting to ban or limit sex change surgeries and transition treatments – like hormone blockers – for children who identify as non binary or transgender. Biden spoke with a panel of six progressive activists for the NowThis News presidential forum on Friday, which aired on Sunday. One of the six panelists was TikTok star Dylan Mulvaney who is documenting their transition from a male to trans woman.

When asked if red states should have the right to pass laws limiting access to gender-affirming treatments, Biden said: ‘I don’t think any state or anybody should have the right to do that.’

‘As a moral question and as a legal question, I just think it’s wrong,’ the president added.

This corruption in the Democratic Party has also made the Republican Party unreliable, which is why the Republican slate in Arizona is so important. All of the state’s major candidates (governor, senate, secretary of state, attorney general) are not from the established party. They are mostly Trump outsiders, who are running on platforms calling for major reform. Giving them all a win will send shockwaves throughout the political landscape, on both sides of the political aisle. The establishment controlling both parties might finally realize they must pay attention to the citizens of the country, not their own wishes.

All these factors suggest that this is a truly significant election. or as Doug Ross noted in this excellent essay:

This is our generation’s fork in the road and the stakes of our decision could not be higher. If we are to protect our society from the inevitable decline and despotism that has infected so many societies since the beginning of time, in whom should we trust? If we are to shield our children from the tyranny against which our founders fought and so many Americans shed blood, in whom should we put our faith?

I contend that we must fight the anti-Constitutional counter-revolution using every political tool at our disposal. We must pledge to return our country to the rule of law, as it was originally defined by our founders and codified in the Constitution. For anything less condemns our descendants to the fate that Thucydides described. The choice is clear. The question is simple.

Which road will you choose?

Thus, below are my updated final election choices. Note too that I have not contributed any money to any of these candidates, nor have I received any money from any candidate or party as well. These opinions are solely my own.

State-wide elections

• U.S. Senate: Blake Masters, without question

Masters is conservative, intelligent, and forthright. You might not agree with him on everything, but his willingness to clearly state what he believes in makes him much more likely to follow through once elected.

The present senator, Democrat Mark Kelly, has been a non-entity who simply rubber-stamps every radical policy that the modern bankrupt Democratic Party advocates. He must go. This clip from the debate between these candidates nicely sums things up. Also, read about Eleven Most Extreme Policies of Democrat Mark Kelly. His votes in the Senate have consistently supported uncontrolled spending while blocking American energy production. He has also voted repeatedly to encourage out-of-control illegal immigration into the state.

Above all, electing Masters will help take control of Congress from that corrupt Democratic Party while also blocking the bankrupt policies of Joe Biden and the administration state that controls him like a puppet.

• Governor: Kari Lake, Republican, without question

Not only has Lake shown herself to be a courageous, outspoken candidate with a clear, intelligent grasp of the state’s biggest problems, her opponent, Democrat Katie Hobbs, has been Arizona’s secretary of state and thus in charge of the election system that produced the last few very questionable elections. Consider for example the following election stories that have occurred only in the past week, all showing that Hobbs is either incompetent at her job, or is entirely in favor of vote tampering.

• Hobbs’ State Dept improperly marked roughly 6,000 voters as only being eligible to vote in federal races, with at least 1,000 of their ballots already mailed out
• Arizona Sec of State Hobbs only came into her office 19 days in past 6 months
• Katie Hobbs to sue Cochise County for hand counting ballots

The last story is entertaining because Cochise County wishes to hand count because it does not trust the computer tabulators Hobbs has imposed on them, based on the audit results from Maricopa County (see graphic below). Hobbs apparently recognizes that the tabulators are probably corrupt, and wants to block a hand count from revealing this fact.

Some additional information about these candidates from my previous post:
—————
To compare these candidates, watch Kari Lake here and here, then watch the clips of Katie Hobbs here. The difference is startling. Hobbs’ inability to express any thought coherently is reminiscent of Kamala Harris.

Note also that Hobbs was successfully sued for allowing racial discrimination in her office when she was the Democratic Party leader in the state senate. Like most modern Democrats, she makes believe she believes in equal rights, but is instead really focused on identity politics and judging people by the color of their skin.
—————

Results of election audit in Maricopa County

• Secretary of State: Mark Finchem, without question

After the 2020 election, Finchem took the lead in pushing for the election audit and several investigations prompted by the questionable results in Arizona. As secretary of state it will be his job to supervisor Arizona’s election process, and his goal is to make sure the system is cleaned up. Watch the clip of a Finchem interview at this link to get a good idea of his even-handed and thoughtful approach.

The graph on the right shows the results from the Finchem-supported audit of the votes in Maricopa County (which covers Phoenix). Note the many many problems highlighted in yellow. These issues need to be resolved, and the present secretary of state, Katie Hobbs, has refused to do so. Finchem’s focus on election reform suggests he will also take on the stone-walling election officials in Maricopa and get things fixed.

• State Attorney General: Abraham Hamadeh, without question

Hamadeh is not a professional politician. He is a former prosecutor as well as a former Army intelligence officer who has been very clear about the failure of the attorney general’s office (presently run by a do-nothing Republican) to enforce the law properly. Thus, his background qualifies him for this job perfectly.

• State Treasurer: Kimberly Yee

She is the Republican incumbent, and thus is guaranteed to be a better choice than the Democrat. Her history as a long-time member of the establishment is the reason I am less enthused about her.

• Superintendent of Public Instruction: Tom Horne, without question

Horne has been outspoken in his opposition to the introduction of critical race theory in the schools. Expect him to push hard against the leftist agenda being pushed by most educators and administrators. He will have a hard fight. His election however would be a major step up, considering his opponent, the incumbent Democrat Kathy Hoffman, has helped introduce critical race theory and the queer agenda into Arizona’s schools.

• Corporation commissioners (vote for two): Nicholas Myers and Kevin Thompson, without question

The Corporation Commission is the board that regulates the state’s electric utilities. Both Myers and Thompson are Republicans and appear to be business-oriented. Their focus will be to make sure Arizonians have power, and at an affordable rate.

Of their Democratic Party opponents, one wants to push solar power, while the other is focused on climate change and the environment. Based on their own positions, it seems they want to turn Arizona into California when it comes to electricity, with frequent blackouts and brownouts and high electric bills. Ugh.

• State mine inspector: Paul Marsh

As Republican Marsh is the only candidate, the choice is easy. That the Democrats couldn’t even find a qualified candidate for this position that regulates mines — one of Arizona’s biggest industries — suggests their professed love of the environment is as shallow as damp sidewalk.

Local elections:
These apply to my specific district, so they of course will only apply to a few of my readers. Nonetheless, I make them public, as they indicate again my overall approach:

• Federal House of Representatives, District 6:: Juan Ciscomani, without question

Ciscomani’s campaign has been uninspired, following the standard approaches and imagery normally pushed by establishment Washington political consultants. Nonetheless, he is a Republican, and even if he ends up to be an establishment Republican congressman, that will be far better than the leftist the Democrats are running.

And once again, his election will help keep Congress out of the control of today’s corrupt Democratic Party. The Democrat running against Ciscomani, Kirsten Engel, is a great example of how corrupt and anti-American that party has become. In September she held an event at the Pima County Democratic Party’s Young Voter Engagement Committee in Tucson, the same Democratic Party group that on July 4, 2022 ran an event they titled “F— the 4th”. Moreover:

It is not the first time Engel has worked with groups behind controversial causes. She solicited donations in 2020 for the Minnesota Freedom Fund, a left-wing organization that has bailed murderers out of jail, the Washington Free Beacon reported. She signed a pledge during the primary to support legislation for reparations promoted by a group that supports the movement to defund police. She met with activists for a voter registration event from Living United for Change in Arizona, a pro-immigration group that came under fire for harassing Sen. Kyrsten Sinema in a bathroom last year.

These is the type of people the Democratic Party is eagerly allied with. Americans should reject this party whole-heartedly.

• State Senator: Thomas Shope, without question
• State Representatives (vote for two): Teresa Martinez and Rob Hudelson, without question

In all three cases, my goal in picking these Republican candidates is to keep Democrats out of office. We need to force a major house-cleaning of the Democratic Party, and the more losses it experiences at all levels of government this year can only help bring that house-cleaning about.

• Bond issue for Marana Unified School District #6

From the pamphlet describing the bond issue:

Of the $90 million bond total, $40 million would pay for new school construction, $29.8 million would be spent on campus improvements and renovations for existing schools, $10.9 million would be spent on technology and security upgrades, and $9.4 million for student transportation.

Considering that attendance at public schools has been dropping, and thus the need for new construction will be less, it seems foolish to approve this expensive borrowing at this time. Moreover, government management across the board has been poor. There is enormous waste in the existing budget that could be used for much of this work, instead of borrowing more.

I vote no.

State Propositions:

Constitutional amendments:

• Proposition 128

I vote no, without reservations.

The proposition attempts to address a real problem that exists. At present the Arizona Constitution forbids legislators from overriding any referendums passed by the voters, even if the courts rule a referendum or any part of it is illegal. The bill would give the legislators the power to amend or supersede any part that the courts rule illegal.

Unfortunately, after reviewing carefully the actual language in the bill, and how it would change the state’s constitution, I cannot support this proposition. The language is poorly written and is very vague and unclear. In the end it would become an open door for the legislature to override every voter referendum without limit. This must not be allowed.

• Proposition 129

Like 128, this proposition would place restrictions on voter initiatives or referendums by requiring them to match the same limits imposed on legislative bills. Each measure must embrace only one subject and that the title of the measure must describe the measure accurately.

I vote yes. This proposition would prevent initiatives with cool-sounding names that often act to do the exact opposite, once passed (think “Patriot Act” and “Inflation Reduction Act”). It would also require voter initiatives to be careful and reasonable.

• Proposition 130

This proposition’s goal was to clean up some messy language in the state constitution. Right now the constitution includes many valid exemptions to paying property tax (for the disabled, war widows, and veterans for example), but those exemptions are scattered throughout. The new language puts them all in one place, in clear and unambiguous terms.

The proposition also eliminates from the state constitution the specific dollar limits listed for some of these exemptions. Such specifics become quickly out of data, and should never be included in the constitution itself. The legislature has passed a new bill outlining these dollar limits, which would become effective once the proposition passes.

I vote yes, without reservations.

• Proposition 131

The proposition creates a position of lieutenant governor who would be picked by the candidate for governor and run as a joint candidate, much like the president and vice president do in national elections. The lieutenant governor would then replace the governor should he or she die or can no longer serve. Right now the law has the secretary of state take over, who could be from another party.

I vote yes, without reservations.

• Proposition 132

Under this proposition, future voter initiatives that propose a new tax must pass by 60% majority.

I vote yes, without reservations. Many of the voter tax initiatives in this state are written and promoted by school unions that want more money for themselves. They dress the initiative as “more money for schools” when it really is more money for them. (See the Marana bond issue above). It should be harder for them to do this.

Citizen initiatives:

• Proposition 209

Based on who endorses this proposition, it appears to be a boondoggle to funnel government money to the healthcare industry and unions. As noted by the very conservative free-enterprise Goldwater Institute, this measure “is funded almost exclusively by California unions [and] will limit the ability of Arizona residents to obtain credit and dramatically increase our interest rates.”

I vote no, without reservations.

• Proposition 210

This proposition is presently under review by the courts, and might be ruled illegal even if it passes. However, as it is written to override recent election reforms passed by the state legislature that were designed to prevent vote tampering and election fraud, the voters should reject it with great enthusiasm, making it unnecessary for the court to do the same.

I vote no, without reservations.

• Proposition 211

This proposition has similar goals to 210, designed in this case to change the election laws to make it easier to identify and attack anyone who donates to election campaigns.

I vote no, without reservations.

Legislative referrals of new proposed laws:

• Proposition 308

This initiative is designed to repeal legislation that forbids tuition subsidies to illegal immigrants. It also appears to give illegal immigrants a benefit not given to legal citizens.

I vote no, without reservations.

• Proposition 309

This proposition will tighten significantly the system of voting by mail. It will require such voters provide strong IDs to make their vote valid.

I vote yes, without reservations.

• Proposition 310

Basically, this proposition would increase the state’s sales tax in order to funnel money to fire departments.

I vote no, without reservations. The state can easily find money for these purposes, out of its present budget. What it needs to do is to better prioritize its spending, eliminating programs that accomplish nothing so that it can increase the budgets of more important agencies.