3D-printed solar panels for cubesats!
The image on the right was sent to me last night by engineer Joe Latrell. It shows a 3D-printed solar panel designed for use on a cubesat. As he wrote,
[This is] the first integration of a solar panel with the 3D printed material. The panel is not attached but rather embedded in the plastic during the printing process. This helps protect the panel from transport damage and makes it easier to assemble the final satellite. This design needs a slight adjustment but is almost there.
What makes Joe’s work most interesting is where he is doing it. Last week, in posting a link to a story about a Rocket Lab deal that would make secondary payloads possible on its smallsat rocket Electron, I noted that things were moving to a point where someone could build a satellite for launch in his garage.
This in turn elicited this comment from Joe:
As a matter of fact, I am building a PocketQube satellite for launch in Q3 2019. Yes, I am working in a small shop – just behind the garage. Nothing fancy but the price was right. I am working with Alba Orbital and the flight is scheduled on the Electron. These are very exciting times.
Alba Orbital is smallsat company aimed at building lots of mass produced smallsats weighing only about two pounds.
Anyway, Joe then followed up with another comment with more information:
This first [satellite] is just to see if it can be done. I plan to have it take a couple images and relay data regarding the orientation methods I am planning to use (gravity and magnetic fields). If it works, I am hoping to get funding to develop a small series of satellites to track global water use.
It is also a good way to test some of the materials I think would make spacecraft lighter and cheaper.
Yesterday he sent me the above image. This is the future of unmanned satellites and planetary probes, small, light, cheap, and built with 3D printers by single entrepreneurs. And because of their inexpensive nature, the possibilities for profit and growth are truly almost infinite, which in turn will provide developments that make space travel for humans increasingly smaller, lighter, cheaper, and easier to build as well.
To repeat Joe’s comment, these are very exciting times.
The support of my readers through the years has given me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Four years ago, just before the 2020 election I wrote that Joe Biden's mental health was suspect. Only in this year has the propaganda mainstream media decided to recognize that basic fact.
Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Even today NASA and Congress refuse to recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation:
5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.
Satellites as a cottage industry. Who’d a ever thunk it.
There are people throwing public temper tantrums over perceived social injustces while others in the same ‘unjust’ society are building space hardware in the garage.
Huh.
When the cubesat concept was first announced to the world, the announcement suggested that they could be satellites for the rest of us; they could be so inexpensive to make and launch that we could have our own personal satellite. Who knows, a cottage industry, with cubesats being kit-built in the garage (remember Heathkit?), may have been part of that dream, incredible as it would have seemed a decade and a half ago.
From what I have been seeing, including Joe Latrell’s work, this is becoming true. Alba Orbital and a few other companies are working on this kind of inexpensive, easy access to space.
The initial idea for the cubesat was to standardize student-built satellites around the world to reduce the complexity of mounting and releasing these satellites as secondary payloads piggybacking on the big rockets. It was quickly realized that such a standard satellite and a standard release mechanism made this class of satellite desirable for more than just students. Now, the military, NASA, NSA, many companies, and other countries also choose this standard as a space platform.
As engineers, such as Joe, and companies find ways to make cubesats and smallsats even less expensive and easier to build, launch, and use, satellites have started becoming smaller and easier to replace as technology advances make them obsolete. Because they are less expensive, these satellites can have short-term missions and have been used as technology test-beds. As Robert has been showing us, over the years, several launch companies are building small rockets to launch these small satellites into useful (non-piggyback) orbits.
In addition to the commercialization of launches and of manned spaceflight, as Joe and Robert noted, this is another part of the space industry that is so exciting, right now, largely because of people like Joe taking the initiative to innovate solutions for reducing the costs and complexities of cubesats and smallsats.
The headline on the latest Space News print edition: “The Evolving Smallsat Ecosystem: Small satellites are at the center of a space industry transformation”
Online coverage of the 2018 AIAA/Utah State Small Satellite Conference:
https://spacenews.com/section/small-satellite-2018/
Now that the launch industry has a way to move forward without the expense of the old way of doing business there is a growth opportunity for CubeSats to take off & blossom into an open ended business. This will reverberate through the “standard” sized satellite market making more opportunities. All providing market for the launch industry. This is the way forward to a more vibrant economic path. Which will set the foundation for further advancement such as space stations. I can see, soon, the need for a basic space station component, cubed shaped, with six docking ports, one on each face. Bet these units become as common as VW bugs.
Pocket Cube is an even more economical version of cube-sat
5cm on a side
I have big hopes for this version
because it is truly small and cheap to launch
The mention of HeathKit sure took me back! I built a HeathKit PC once, at the kitchen table no less, and the thing worked right off the bat! Maybe someday I’ll be able to buy a sat kit off the shelf, launch included?