NASA has chosen Boeing and SpaceX to build manned spacecraft to ferry crews to ISS
The competition heats up: NASA has made a decision and has chosen two companies to ferry astronauts to and from ISS, and those companies are Boeing and SpaceX.
I am watching the press conference on NASA television. Some quick details from NASA here.
This is a reasonable political and economic decision. It confirms that SpaceX is ready to go and gives the company the opportunity to finish the job, while also giving Boeing the chance to show that it can compete while also giving that pork to congressional districts.
Some details: After NASA has certified that each company has successfully built its spacecraft they will have then fly anywhere from four to six missions. The certification process will be step-by-step, similar to the methods used in the cargo contracts, and will involve five milestones. They will be paid incrementally as they meet these milestones.
One milestone will be a manned flight to ISS, with one NASA astronaut on board.
One more detail. Boeing will receive $4.2 billion while SpaceX will get $2.6 billion. These awards were based on what the companies proposed and requested.
I will have more to say about this tonight on Coast to Coast, as well as on the John Batchelor show.
The support of my readers through the years has given me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Four years ago, just before the 2020 election I wrote that Joe Biden's mental health was suspect. Only in this year has the propaganda mainstream media decided to recognize that basic fact.
Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Even today NASA and Congress refuse to recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation:
5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.
Weird non announcement? Never really came out and said the winners are — just as Bolden was going on about how cool Orion and CCDev were going to be mentioned how the Boeing and SpaceX teams were expected to….
It almost seemed like the announcement of the winners had already gone out, and was just mentions as a aside in this presentation?
If he said “President Obama’s vision” one more time, I was going to puke
Two questions to ask:
1) ISS policy is to have a spare docking/berthing port available for berthing/docking ops. There are two CBM’s (so one cargo craft at a time) and 2 PMA’s (will get IDA/NDS adapters to allow Dragon/CST-100). So if they do a lifeboat mission, it will tie up one port for 180 days, which means no other manned US missions till it is done. Do they plan on more PMA’s?
2) Per the safety standards they are following, did Soyuz ever go through them? How about the Shuttle? How about Apollo? (We know the answer is no, but it would be nice to hear them admit it and the hypocrisy of suddenly becoming safety conscious.)
I hope that Sierra Nevada continues its development, just as Blue Horizon has done. I suspect that once there is a lot of access to low Earth orbit via such space taxis, the Bigelow space habitats will be very popular alternative space stations to the ISS.
One of the problems with doing experiments on the ISS is that NASA insists that the data become public in five years, which gives a company a short period of time to develop its idea before the rest of the world can benefit from that company’s expensive research program.
Another benefit of Bigelow space stations is that non-spacefaring countries can create their own space programs by buying, leasing, or renting-space-on a habitat and performing their own research. Some combination of SpaceX, Boeing, Sierra Nevada, and Blue Horizon would be available to taxi various countries’, companies, and universities’ astronauts to those space stations.
The idea of space hotels for rich tourists, such as Sarah Brightman, would still be a likely destination for these space taxis.
With each step toward the completion of the commercial space program, I get more excited that we may finally realize some of the dreams, ideas, and plans that the US had for space, half a century ago.
Apollo went through several tests of the launch escape system. Including one test that showed just how well it worked.
The booster fell apart and the escape system worked perfectly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AqeJzItldSQ
Not saying they did not test Apollo (I am saying they did not test the Shuttle). But the standards they are holding Commercial crew too, could Shuttle, Soyuz, or Apollo pass? Did they pass?
The Soyuz went through the test of having a rocket explode on the pad under a maned capsule. The escape system worked.
Only the Columbia, only her first test flights had an ejection system that might
have saved two pilots max. Never tested.
Ascent and decent destruction events proved the Shuttle a fail not safe
system….. Orginal design provided for the crew capsule to be an emergency
escape pod . . . To expensive and heavy to build was the decision.
Results we all now know…………
AB
I do not think a ‘live’ test is what NASA has in mind for certifications…
;)
Serious suck-uppage going on there.
According to statements made at the press conference, a live demo mission to ISS is exactly what NASA has in mind for certification.
Live test of the abort system, with humans aboard was the context.
Live test of a SUCCESSFUL launch to the ISS of course.
We talk about the emergency escape system of spacecraft, but what is the emergency escape system of a 747? A proven safety record you say? OK, a Ford Trimotor then. As with the old sailing ships, your life belongs to the ship. You live or die with it.