New video of Starliner pad abort test
Boeing has released a new video of the Starliner pad abort test on November 4th, showing the full flight.
I have embedded the footage below the fold. The one aspect of this test that I have as yet not seen any explanation for is the red cloud to the left of the capsule’s touch down spot. It surely looks like the kind of smoke one sees from the release of certain toxic fuels. It was also something that the live stream video focused on, suggesting the possibility that its existence was important and needed to be recorded for engineering reasons.
Regardless, the fact that any onboard astronauts would have been safely returned to Earth, based on this test, should mean Boeing’s abort system is functioning properly. They note that they have pinpointed the reason one parachute did not deploy (“attributed to the lack of a secure connection between the pilot chute and one of the main chutes”), a problem that is probably quite simple to fix. Hopefully that one failure will not cause any significant delays in their future flights, including the first manned flight next year.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
Boeing has released a new video of the Starliner pad abort test on November 4th, showing the full flight.
I have embedded the footage below the fold. The one aspect of this test that I have as yet not seen any explanation for is the red cloud to the left of the capsule’s touch down spot. It surely looks like the kind of smoke one sees from the release of certain toxic fuels. It was also something that the live stream video focused on, suggesting the possibility that its existence was important and needed to be recorded for engineering reasons.
Regardless, the fact that any onboard astronauts would have been safely returned to Earth, based on this test, should mean Boeing’s abort system is functioning properly. They note that they have pinpointed the reason one parachute did not deploy (“attributed to the lack of a secure connection between the pilot chute and one of the main chutes”), a problem that is probably quite simple to fix. Hopefully that one failure will not cause any significant delays in their future flights, including the first manned flight next year.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
The red cloud was almost certainly from the service module crashing near by. I think the original real-time broadcast did mention, before the test occurred, the service module would crash nearby, something that wouldn’t be an issue in a recovery at sea.
But yeah, hypergolics. No question.
This red cloud is nitrogen tretroxide (N2O4) vapor , the toxic and hazardous oxidizer used in service module propulsion system propellant combination.
Diane, to add onto your comment…
The hosts of the livestream also mentioned that we might see a fire from the service module crashing and releasing its fuel. I guess the hypergolics didn’t mix enough to cause that, but we did get a nice Orange Cloud of Doom.
If the parachute foul-up was just a badly-connected line, that’s great news. I was worried that ‘leftover’ hypergolics from the abort motors firing had attacked the ‘chute lines.
Well now I’m less sanguine about the parachute failure. Seems like they were able to tell that a pin wasn’t in place thanks to a photo taken before closing up the vehicle. And yet they didn’t find the problem because of a protective shroud over the pin assembly?
https://spacenews.com/missing-pin-blamed-for-boeing-pad-abort-parachute-anomaly/
IANARE (I Am Not A Rocket Engineer), but this seems like amateur hour. I thought Boeing was supposed to be the seasoned adult as compared with the SpaceX whippersnapper?
Boeing is amateur hour. They act that the parachute not deploying is no big deal. Someone didn’t do their job. If crew had been on board, sorry, someone didn’t do their job. Sounds like NASA and the two lost shuttles. They didn’t think their problems were that serious to delay launches and make the engineers fix the defects. Peoples lives are at stake.
I think I found the problem! From the article Scott linked to:
“‘We’ll spend a week and a half and pour through’ that data, he said.”
Depending on what they intend to pour through the data (hopefully nothing stronger than coffee), I don’t think they’ll be too successful.
… or perhaps they just need a better editor.
Correction: dinitrogen tretroxide (N2O4)
It is a shame that no safe, non-toxic and long time storable replacement for it was found after 50 years of research on this topic. This task seems to be more difficult as developing resusable rockets.
They looked directly at the problem.
They even took a picture of the problem.
They never reviewed the pictures with the parachute team before launch.
To busy? Day off?
An oldy but a goody….
“Toxic Propellant Hazards In Rocketry”
1966 NASA
https://youtu.be/ND2TeNfcmKA
21:56
“Hypergolic fuels include hydrazine and its derivatives including; mono methyl hydrazine (MMH), unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH), and Aerozine 50, which is an equal mixture of NA and UDMH.”