The ship cut in half
An evening pause: The youtube page explains:
Norwegian cruise ship “Braemar” was literally split in half. Carried out at the shipyard in Hamburg operation was aimed at extending the hull by 30 feet. Between the two separated parts inserted third. The ship was repainted and with a new name – “Balmoral” – went on another tour.
Hat tip Edward Thelen.
Readers!
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your support allows me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
Legos!!!
It’s amazing that it is practical to rebuild ships in this manner. They weren’t designed for it to begin with, I assume. Kockums, the Swedish u-boat builder, extends “any conventional” submarines like this, cutting up their hull to extend them and install their silent Stirling engines.
So interesting, Edward. Thanks!
Nice selection!
I found it interesting that the large, rail-mounted cranes followed the ship in and out of the graving dock. I wonder if they were controlling hawsers to aid the tug boats in the berthing and unberthing.
If you notice when the ship leaves drydock, it’s still named Braemar. That’s because Balmoral is another ship that under went the same modification. Both ships operated by John Olsen Cruise Line. Still an interesting video, 2 thumbs up.
“Birth of Victory” 1945
Building the Liberty Ships During World War II
https://youtu.be/LUm6xjXq3MU
(56:01)
“Henry Kaiser was known for developing new methods of modular ship building, which allowed his yards to outproduce other similar facilities and build 1,490 ships, 27 percent of the total Maritime Commission construction. Kaiser’s ships were completed in two-thirds the time and a quarter the cost of the average of all other shipyards. Liberty ships were typically assembled in a little over two weeks, and one in less than five days.”
“The Liberty ship SS Robert E. Peary was assembled in less than five days as a part of a special competition among shipyards. At the Oregon Shipbuilding Yard on the Columbia River, near Portland, the Victory ship SS Joseph N. Teal was built in ten days in fall 1942.”
The Peary was, even at the time, acknowledged to be a stunt with much pre-stocking of materials. In terms of increasing the size of ships, its called “jumboizing” and has been done for decades.
From Wikipedia
Jumboization is a technique in shipbuilding consisting of enlarging a ship by adding an entire section to it. By contrast with refitting or installation of equipment, jumboization is a long and complex endeavour which can require a specialized shipyard.
Enlarging a ship by jumboization allows an increase in its value without needing to purchase or build an entirely new ship. This technique has been used on cruise ships and tankers, as well as smaller vessels like sailing or fishing ships
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumboisation
It’s been done this way for a long time. For example, the first SSBN boats were created by cutting SSN boats in half and splicing in the missile tubes, back around 1960. When I worked as a marine machinery mechanic (long time ago) boats in for repair and refit had “patches” cut in the hull for access, as there was no way the stuff inside was going to come out and be put back in via the weapons loading hatch. When the refit was done, the patches cut out with carbon arc were simply welded back in. Standard shipbuilding technique.
Tarkus,
That would be the Fred Olsen Cruise Line. Balmoral and Braemar are, indeed, separate ships in the same fleet. Another inaccuracy is the size of the stretch section for Braemar. It wasn’t 30 feet, it was 102 feet. The Balmoral’s was 98 feet. Watching the video, the inserted section was obviously a lot longer than 30 feet. Here’s a link to a site with the relevant data.
Thank you.
That 30 foot extension did not make sense to me, I thought as I read that spec. 30 feet, whats the point? Still its one hell of an undertaking in the “big” class of projects, and they really go on more often than one would think. Lots of big stuff out there.
Thank you Mr Eagleson,
Great link. Much better site than where I found my information.