The long minimum continues


Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar to the right or below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

Though it has been very clear for the past few months that the sun has finally transitioned from solar minimum and begun its ramp up to solar maximum, that ramp up has also been very slow and wimpy.

On October 9, 2011 the scientists at Physikalisch- Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos (PMOD) posted an updated summary of the satellite data that has been carefully measuring the variation of the sun’s total solar irradiance since 1978. The graph below, which can be found here [pdf], brings that data up through the present. (I had posted the previous update about a year ago.)

Total solar irradiance

I have added a brown line to illustrate how deep the recently ended solar minimum was, compared to previous minimums. Note also that this most recent minimum would also be far below the minimum prior to 1975. I have also added a blue line to show that the sun has only very recently finally brightened enough to finally exceed the previous minimum. All told, the sun remained dimmer than the previous minimum for over five years!

Though this deep minimum was unprecedented since the beginning of satellite data, we shouldn’t misunderstand it. The drop in brightness, as deep and as long as it was, was still a drop of only 0.02 percent, clearly not large enough to have significantly cooled the Earth’s climate. Other effects are required to link this drop with the climate changes that scientists have been seeing.

Nonetheless, this graph, combined with the realization that the climate has not been warming for more than a dozen years, leaves scientists with a very tantalizing question: How do the sun and the climate interact, and how important is the sun’s behavior on both short and long term climate change?

At present we only have this kind of circumstantial evidence. The exact mechanism to explain that interaction remains a mystery, though there are theories.

Share

2 comments

  • jwing

    Alas, if I were only “forward-leaning” and sophisticated enough to put my trust in wise men like Algore, Letterman and Stewart, as so many progressive elites have done. I needn’t be bothered by such things as empirical data, rigorous scientific methods or common sense. Oh, what a waste it was for me to earn a master of science in environmental (civil) engineering, if I just had maintained my childlike optimism in fairy tales, I could change the whole world by just closing my eyes and clicking my heels together. (sarcasm OFF)

  • haha jwing^^ , thanks for another wonderful post bob! truely fascinating^

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *