A breakthrough in creating fusion power?

Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar to the right. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

A privately funded company has successfully kept a ball of superheated gas stable for a record time, 5 milliseconds, putting them closer to producing fusion power.

“They’ve succeeded finally in achieving a lifetime limited only by the power available to the system,” says particle physicist Burton Richter of Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, who sits on a board of advisers to Tri Alpha. If the company’s scientists can scale the technique up to longer times and higher temperatures, they will reach a stage at which atomic nuclei in the gas collide forcefully enough to fuse together, releasing energy.

Although other startup companies are also trying to achieve fusion using similar methods, the main efforts in this field are huge government-funded projects such as the $20 billion International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), under construction in France by an international collaboration, and the U.S. Department of Energy’s $4 billion National Ignition Facility (NIF) in Livermore, California. But the burgeoning cost and complexity of such projects are causing many to doubt they will ever produce plants that can generate energy at an affordable cost.

Tri Alpha’s and similar efforts take a different approach, which promises simpler, cheaper machines that can be developed more quickly. Importantly, the Tri Alpha machine may be able to operate with a different fuel than most other fusion reactors. This fuel—a mix of hydrogen and boron—is harder to react, but Tri Alpha researchers say it avoids many of the problems likely to confront conventional fusion power plants. “They are where they are because people are able to believe they can get a [hydrogen-boron] reactor to work,” says plasma physicist David Hammer of Cornell University, also a Tri Alpha adviser.

The article does not say how much this success cost the privately-funded Tri Alpha, but it certainly wasn’t in the billions of dollars. Yet, it appears that in less than a decade they have accomplished more than all these big government-funded projects have in the past half century, and for less money.

Does that story sound familiar?


  • Cotour

    Talk about fantasies. I would tend to believe that the Ecat was a more viable and achievable technology refinement, and it probably has more of a track record of successful, documented actual production of excess power. Fusion seems more like the cure for cancer to me, lots and lots of very, very big money, lots of very high salaries at what cost per watt produced? Forget about short term cost per watt but even long term cost per watt.

    Keep working on it but I would tend to think the realization of power from fusion is a long way down the road.

  • Edward

    I have been hearing for the past four decades that fusion power is only three decades away.

    Lockheed Martin’s Skunk Works also thinks that they will produce fusion power in a compact size.

    Although both companies (and any others that may be working on fusion power) are working off of the technologies that were developed at the national labs, it seems to me that the private sector is more committed to developing profitable, useful fusion power than the national labs are.

  • Cotour

    Its encouraging (?) to know that the Skunk Works is involved in this, I assume spending government money, but by their own admission they are at least 10 to 20 years from commercialization. But you also get the impression that they are not 100% sure it is doable but are willing to investigate / spend a lot of money to find out.

    Every long journey begins with the first step but this journey seems to continuously be made longer and longer. And do we really possess the level of technology at this point in time to make it a reality? I suppose to answer that question you are going to have to monkey around with it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *