Linking mass extinctions to the Sun’s journey in the Milky Way

Week Three: Ninth Anniversary Fund-Raising Drive for Behind the Black

It is now the third week in my annual anniversary fund-raising campaign for Behind the Black.

Please consider donating. I am trying to avoid advertising on this website, but will be forced to add it if I do not get enough support from my readers. You can give a one-time contribution, from $5 to $100, or a regular subscription for as little as $2 per month. Your support will be deeply appreciated, and will allow me to continue to report on science and culture freely.

Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

The Sun's orbit in the Milky Way

In a paper published today on the Los Alamos astro-ph preprint service, astronomers propose that as many as eleven past extinction events can be linked to the Sun’s passage through the spiral arms of the Milky Way. (You can download the paper here [pdf].)

A correlation was found between the times at which the Sun crosses the spiral arms and six known mass extinction events. Furthermore, we identify five additional historical mass extinction events that might be explained by the motion of the Sun around our Galaxy. These five additional significant drops in marine genera that we find include significant reductions in diversity at 415, 322, 300, 145 and 33 Myr ago. Our simulations indicate that the Sun has spent ~60% of its time passing through our Galaxy’s various spiral arms.

The figure on the right, from their paper, shows the Sun’s orbit in red over the last half billion years. The Sun’s present position is indicated by the yellow spot, and the eleven extinctions are indicated by the circles.

There are obviously a great deal of uncertainties in this conclusion. Most significantly, the shape and history of the Milky Way remains very much in doubt, especially since we reside within it and cannot really get a good look at it. Though in recent years astronomers have assembled a reasonable image of the galaxy’s shape — a barred spiral with two major arms and several minor ones — this picture includes many assumptions that could very easily be wrong.

Nonetheless, the paper’s conclusions are interesting.

The theory is that when the Sun passes through the more crowded spiral arms, there is a greater chance that the Oort Cloud will be disturbed, producing a shower of comets descending into the inner solar system and thereby producing the extinction events.

The authors admit the speculative nature of their results. They also note, however, that if true, this data can be useful for helping to constrain the location of the smaller spurs and arms of the Milky Way.

If we were to assume that the extinctions are solely caused by impacts induced by our passage through spiral arms, then this would clearly allow us to constrain their locations independent of astronomical observations – an interesting test for the current model of galactic structure.

Finally, the authors note that these extinction events might actually helpful for the development of complex life, and therefore a habitable planet’s location within the galaxy might be crucial.

[R]econsidering the possibility that spiral arms do cause extinctions on Earth, we can consider the ramifications of this to possible complex life elsewhere in the Galaxy. If we also consider that extinctions accelerate rather than impede the evolution of complex life, we may better constrain ideas on the Galactic Habitable Zone. It may be the case that habitable planets orbiting stars further from the Galactic centre do not retain a high enough organic turn over rate due to more infrequent spiral arm crossings, or that closer in the extinction rate exceeds the ability for life to recover. Consideration could also be given to the possibility that habitable planet-hosting stars may have highly eccentric orbits around the Galaxy. [emphasis mine]

Essentially, a star’s orbit within a galaxy might play an important role in whether intelligent life evolves. Too far out and not enough extinction events will occur to help the evolution of complex life forms. Too close in and too many extinctions will cut off the development of life in general.

It appears from this work that our Sun might very well be in just the right place.



  • mpthompson

    What has always fascinated me is that in the 4.5 billions years since the birth of the solar system, we apparently haven’t passed close enough to another star while orbiting the galaxy to seriously disrupt the orbit of the planets. Are we just really lucky or is space really that big?

  • Keith

    It looks fairly close to the next extinction event spot.
    How long until we get there?
    Should I mark my calendar and start hoarding canned goods?

  • Patrick Ritchie

    Fascinating, I’m thrilled to see some research being done on this topic, the relatively evenly spaced extinction events in the earth’s past always struck me as unlikely to be purely coincidental. It’s good to see real science being done on the topic.

  • Edward

    To give some perspective, the solar system is about 10 light-hours in radius. The nearest star, Alpha Centauri, is about four light years away (). The ratio is around 5,000 to 1, or about four orders of magnitude difference. Alpha Centauri, (and other stars) has a huge volume to move around in without coming very close to our solar system.

    Yeah, that’s big, all right.

  • Pzatchok

    I wonder if passing through the galacticaly denser areas of the arms would cause a higher rate and possibility of gamma bursts hits?

    Another thing that could cause mass extinctions.

    And some of those mass extinctions events could have been caused by the effects of living organisms on the planet. Aerobic vs anaerobic. At times we have had higher concentrations of gases other than those we have now. Past life forms could have been more susceptible to slight changes in the atmosphere than those we have now.

    Thus not having anything to do with our planets position in the galaxy.

  • Edward

    Think about playing marbles where the marbles are all 100 feet apart (and that is only 2-dimensional space).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *