The competing extinction theories battle it out

For many reasons, mostly political but partly ethical, I do not use Google, Facebook, Twitter. They practice corrupt business policies, while targeting conservative websites for censoring, facts repeatedly confirmed by news stories and by my sense that Facebook has taken action to prevent my readers from recommending Behind the Black to their friends.
Thus, I must have your direct support to keep this webpage alive. Not only does the money pay the bills, it gives me the freedom to speak honestly about science and culture, instead of being forced to write it as others demand.


Please consider donating by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar below.


Regular readers can support Behind The Black with a contribution via paypal:

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:

If Paypal doesn't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652


You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

New evidence bolsters the asteroid impact theory of dinosaur extinction 65 million years ago.

I am sure you all thought the cause of the dinosaurs’ extinction — an asteroid impact on the Yucatan peninsula — was settled science. Wrong!

Palaeontologists and planetary scientists have been arguing about it for two decades, with the palaeontologists favoring a more gradual extinction process caused by multiple environmental factors (sea level rise, volcanic activity, and asteroid impact) and the planetary scientists favoring the asteroid impact as the sole cause. This story above provides a small data point favoring the planetary scientists, but hardly proves anything.

One of the reasons the asteroid impact theory dominates the public perception is that the media loves it. Who can resist such a story? Unfortunately, the people who study the fossils, palaeontologists, have remained very skeptical, as the fossil evidence hasn’t confirmed this theory as well as it should.


One comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *