Conscious Choice cover

From the press release: In this ground-breaking new history of early America, historian Robert Zimmerman not only exposes the lie behind The New York Times 1619 Project that falsely claims slavery is central to the history of the United States, he also provides profound lessons about the nature of human societies, lessons important for Americans today as well as for all future settlers on Mars and elsewhere in space.

 
Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space, is a riveting page-turning story that documents how slavery slowly became pervasive in the southern British colonies of North America, colonies founded by a people and culture that not only did not allow slavery but in every way were hostile to the practice.  
Conscious Choice does more however. In telling the tragic history of the Virginia colony and the rise of slavery there, Zimmerman lays out the proper path for creating healthy societies in places like the Moon and Mars.

 

“Zimmerman’s ground-breaking history provides every future generation the basic framework for establishing new societies on other worlds. We would be wise to heed what he says.” —Robert Zubrin, founder of founder of the Mars Society.

 

Available everywhere for $3.99 (before discount) at Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and all ebook vendors, or direct from the ebook publisher, ebookit. And if you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and I get a bigger cut much sooner.


The pork of Obamacare

The Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), created by Obamacare, announced its first round of grants today, part of a funding program of fifty “pilot projects” totaling $30 million.

It didn’t take much research for me to conclude that, while some of this work might be useful, most of it sounds like bureaucratic claptrap. For example, consider the description Nature gives for these three grants:

  • With $425,286, a team at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston will examine negative outcomes that aren’t symptoms of rare genetic diseases – such as lack of affordable drug or therapy options, insurance concerns, and social stigma. In local and virtual communities of patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, they’ll try to measure these burdens.
  • A research group at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia in Pennsylvania received $668,190 to figure out how to weigh the views of children with autism with those of their parents in treatment decisions and outcome preferences.
  • At Ohio State University in Columbus, a $653,014 project will study virtual reality gaming as a potential cost-effective neurological rehab therapy for stroke patients who suffer from chronic hemiparesis, or weakness on one side of the body.

All three sound suspiciously like a waste of money, better spent in numerous other ways.

After reading the Nature article, I went to the PCORI website and randomly downloaded a half dozen other grants, just to see if my suspicions were correct. All were vague and incoherent. For example, consider this $629,626 grant to the University of Arizona for “Integrating and Comparing Community-Based Participatory and Conjoint Analysis”. Let me quote the abstract:

For this project we will implement and test two multi-component methods by which patient preferences for the delivery of behavioral health services can be efficiently gathered and translated into patient-centered care options and outcomes for SCHC, and for other FQHCs serving low-income, primarily Hispanic patients. The first multi-component method will integrate components of participatory research and systematic qualitative data collection and analysis. The second method will add conjoint analysis to further improve patient centered-care in real world, choice-based, scenarios. The conjoint survey will reflect a range of patient-centered service attributes and provider-relevant attributes important to SCHC’s complex service environment. Conjoint analysis will yield information on the relative importance of each of the attributes considered and whether there are identifiable patient segments with similar internal preferences, whose preferences differ strongly from those of other segments.

If you can tell me what any of that means, you are either lying to yourself, or getting some of the funds and want to protect your interests.

Almost all the grants were given in big urban areas that are Democratic Party strongholds. I wonder why.

But then, this is the government. What matter if this work makes no sense? What matter that there might be some political payback and pork in how the money is distributed. A government official has declared it’s important, so shut up and pay up!

Readers!
 

I must unfortunately ask you for your financial support because I do not depend on ads and rely entirely on the generosity of readers to keep Behind the Black running. You can either make a one time donation for whatever amount you wish, or you sign up for a monthly subscription ranging from $2 to $15 through Paypal or $3 to $50 through Patreon.


Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.


Your support is even more essential to me because I not only keep this site free from advertisements, I do not use the corrupt social media companies like Google, Twitter, and Facebook to promote my work. I depend wholly on the direct support of my readers.


You can provide that support to Behind The Black with a contribution via Patreon or PayPal. To use Patreon, go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. For PayPal click one of the following buttons:
 


 

Or with a subscription with regular donations from your Paypal or credit card account:


 

If Patreon or Paypal don't work for you, you can support Behind The Black directly by sending your donation by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman, to
 

Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
 

Or you can donate by using Zelle through your bank. You will need to give my name and email address (found at the bottom of the "About" page). The best part of this electronic option is that no fees will be deducted! What you donate will be what I receive.

4 comments

  • George Benkel

    Why would government help people?

  • JFincannon

    It seems that the money should be spent on things like hand, arm or leg transplants. I could not believe it when I saw a recent article about this being done in Mexico. http://apnews.myway.com/article/20120608/D9V8MUT83.html
    “Mexican man gets double arm transplant” Jun 7, 2012

    To confirm what might be a sensationalistic story, I found a legitimate source in a medical journal… Bilateral trans-humeral arm transplantation: result at 2 years. Cavadas PC, et al., Am J Transplant. 2011 May;11(5):1085-90. “… At 26 months post-transplantation, the patient has excellent elbow active movement, active flexion and extension of the thumb and fingers, useful sensation and a gainful job.”

  • Edward

    It is easy to figure out what it means, without lying or receiving funds. Get rid of the obfuscating words, substitute real words for the bogus ones, and there you have it:

    They will test two methods of determining the preferences of Latino illegal aliens for receiving psychoanalysis. The first method will combine research, data collection, and analysis. The second method will add analysis. This survey [which was an analysis in the previous sentence – go figure] will be ranked by patient preference and doctor preference. Analysis [which was a survey a moment ago] will present the rankings of these preferences and contrast them with the preferences of people who strongly disagree with those rankings.

    In case that was not clear:

    They will compare the priorities of illegal alien patients with those of doctors and contrast them with those of people with completely different priorities [perhaps the people paying for the care].

    Who can argue with that study?

    I mean, who but the taxpayer can argue with that study?

  • Sara

    the us was, and is a corrupt cesspool–what else is new?

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *